Report to: |
Cabinet |
|---|---|
Date: |
16 November 2006 |
Subject: |
Corporate Plan performance report up to Quarter 2 2006-07 (1 April – 30 September 2006) |
Report of: |
Chief Executive |
Contact officer: |
James Winterbottom 827473 |
Purpose / summary: |
To report performance against our key PIs |
Alternative options considered and reason for selecting the one recommended: |
No alternative. |
Recommendation / decision: |
Members are requested to accept this report |
Key Decision: |
This report does not involve a key decision. |
Implications: |
|
Summary of reasons for report being closed in the public interest: |
|
Financial: |
Within existing resources |
Staffing: |
Within existing resources |
Policy: |
All |
Equal Opportunities - Has a Diversity Impact Assessment been conducted? |
No |
Wards affected: |
All |
Special Interest Members – Which have been consulted |
No |
Tracking/Process:
|
Consultation |
Ward Members |
Partners |
|---|---|---|---|
|
- |
- |
- |
Panel |
Overview & Scrutiny |
Cabinet |
Council |
Audit & Governance- 23 November |
- |
16 November 2006 |
- |
There are no Background Papers to this Report within the meaning of Section 100D of the Local Government Act 1972.
Proper Officer |
Joyce Redfearn |
|---|---|
Date |
7 November 2006 |
This report outlines our performance from the start of the financial year to the end of quarter 2 of 2006/07 (1 April – 30 September 2006) against our high level set of indicators. It also shows progress against the key tasks in the Corporate Plan.
That members accept this report.
No alternative.
Performance in general is positive with 57% of the PIs meeting or exceeding targets. Progress on the key tasks during quarter 2 has been excellent with 100% on or ahead of schedule.
We reported performance on the Corporate Plan to you at the end of the first quarter of this year. There is some good news to share with you regarding the following performance indicators that were below target in quarter 1 but have now met or exceeded their targets for quarter 2: