Home > Services > Council and Democracy > Council, Cabinet and Committees > The Cabinet

Question Reference Number 32877

Question submitted on 29 October 2009 by: Heather

I know we have several recycling bins for garden waste, tins and bottles and newspapers etc. but why don't we have provision for recycling cardboard (eg. cereal boxes) in the Wigan borough?

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio holder for Environment and Regeneration (and Deputy Leader of the Council):

'The Council currently recycles all types of cardboard at four of its five Household Waste Recycling Centres, the exception being at Orrell where there is insufficient space to offer a full recycling service. In addition, brown cardboard can be included in the green bins that are provided to 70% of properties within the borough and are collected fortnightly. The reason that only brown cardboard can be included is because it breaks down naturally with garden waste to produce a compost that can be reused as a soil conditioner.

Developments in recycling technology now provide the opportunity to mix more materials to the fortnightly paper recycling collections that the Council provides. In July next year we will be trialling a blue wheeled bin collection service in which all cardboard and paper items can be collected. If the trial is successful we aim to roll the service out to all properties by March 2012. Residents will be given the opportunity to choose the size of bin or continue to use a sack.'

Question Reference Number: 32921

Question submitted on 2 November 2009 by: Peter Fleetwood

I believe a planning application will be submitted shortly to the council for the development of Mesnes Playing Field for a boys and girls club. 1. Can I ask what consultation the council will undertake to canvas the views of local residents and the wider population of Wigan. 2. Why have the council not provided any press releases on this proposed development? 3. Which member/dept/council employee allowed the Mesnes Playing Field to be included in the list of sites for consideration?

Answer from Councillor Ged Bretherton - Cabinet portfolio holder for Equality and Young People:

1. The planning application was submitted on Friday 30th October. A technical evaluation is now being undertaken of the application, following which all relevant consultation will be undertaken. It is anticipated that this will be commenced on 6th November 2009. Publicity of the application will be in accordance with the council's Statement of Community Involvement and Code of Practice for Publicity for Planning Applications. This will take the form of a press notice, site notices and individual letters of notification to nearby property owners.

Prior to the submission of the application the applicant undertook a community involvement exercise, including an exhibition at the college.

2. The matter has been the subject of numerous press articles, which the council has contributed to as appropriate. As part of the planning application publicity the council will publish a notice in the newspaper (as referred to above).

3. The planning application includes a planning statement which contains a review of all the sites that were considered by the applicant. The council both at officer level and member level gave no approval to the site being included within the scope of their search. It is entirely at the discretion of a prospective developer to decide which site it wishes to submit a planning application for. Planning legislation allows an application to be submitted where the applicant does not own the site (indeed even without the land owner's consent), provided notice is served on the land owner. The correct procedure has been followed in this case.

Question Reference Number: 32941

Question submitted on 3 November 2009 by: Trevor Bell

Does the Cabinet agree in principle that Leigh should have access to the upgraded Manchester to Liverpool rail line? If so, will the Council lobby the relevant bodies for this to happen?

Answer from Councillor Peter Smith - Council Leader (and Chairman of the Cabinet):

The Council recognises the need to improve public transport provision in order to increase accessibility to and from Leigh. If public transport provision was improved Leigh's residents would have better access to job and leisure opportunities in Greater Manchester. To obtain public funding the Department for Transport has to approve a business case for both capital cost and revenue support. Rail investment into Leigh has not met the business case.The proposed Leigh - Salford guided busway project led by GMPTE will bring such benefits to the Leigh community in cutting down journey times into the city centre. The recent government announcement to spend £100 Million upgrading and electrifying the Liverpool to Manchester rail line which would cut journey times between the two cities to 30 minutes is good news for the sub region. It would be difficult to see how a direct rail link to Leigh could be provided from this line without signficantly compromising other objectives, such as quicker journey times. The feasibility of, and business case for, creating a link via the old Kenyon junction for example is extremely questionable and the strategic public transport needs of the Leigh community might be better served by ensuring the delivery of the Leigh - Salford Guided Busway, a scheme that is feasible and which now has project approval through AGMA.

Question Reference Number: 32979

Question submitted on 4 November 2009 by: John McDonald

What is actively being done to alleviate the significant traffic problems in the Wigan area? Such areas as Poolstock lane, Hindley, Saddle Junction etc. Poolstock lane is an absolute nightmare from half 4 to 6 in the evenings not great in the mornings either. I try to walk when I can but when I need to drive, to get to my house from Wigan can take anywhere from 15-30mins to travel 1 mile. Other colleagues have taken over an hour to get in from the Hindley area in the mornings.

Answer from Cabinet Portfolio holder for Environment and Regeneration (and Deputy Leader of the Council):

Managing the road network in Wigan is challenging given that there is a finite supply of available road and kerb space, due to the historic nature of how the borough has developed. Demand for the use of this available space for moving vehicles, servicing and for parking, significantly exceeds capacity in many parts of the Borough, especially in town centres. Average journey speeds across Greater Manchester have been falling as congestion levels have risen, along with rising traffic levels against a backdrop of relatively fixed amount of road space.

There are three broad approaches that may be taken in response to congestion that could assist rebalancing capacity with demand:

1) Increase effective road capacity - by providing more road space (e.g. through road building), increasing effectual road space through ‘engineering solutions’ to road layout and markings or reallocating road space for general traffic from other road users (e.g. conversion of bus/cycle lanes or pedestrian zone). Wigan Council is actively promoting a number of new highway schemes to reduce congestion and improve traffic flow in the borough. The Saddle Link Road and Wigan Inner Relief Route will provide direct congestion relief for the immediate area, but also indirect benefits for neighbouring corridors such as Poolstock. In addition, there are proposals for the A49 diversion from Westwood to the A49 Warrington Road, which will have a direct benefit to Poolstock in terms of congestion relief.

2) Optimising the use of existing road space – This can be achieved, for example, through traffic management and traffic regulation, the enforcement of traffic orders, and more intelligent and responsive traffic signal control technology.

3) Measures that encourage modal shift - Active Travel and Smarter Choices packages actively encourage and promote walking, cycling and the use of public transport as practical and realistic alternatives to car use to access local amenities. This is a growing area of interest and the following websites may provide further information about alternative travel choices:

activetravelwigan.co.uk (external link) travel choice information to access local amenities and leaflet ordering service

walkit.com(external link) - walking journey planner

cyclegm.org(external link) - cycling journey planner

gmpte.com(external link) - public transport journey planners

 

Question Reference Number: 32982

Question submitted on 4 November 2009 by: John McDonald

I read in the local press about the apathy of the Wigan public when asked the views about having an elected mayor or cabinet. How do you intend to address the poor public response and engage the public if they are not interested? Also, why spend the taxpayer’s money on consulting if the public are not bothered? It is difficult to address, For example, I think this is a very good idea but do people know about this chance to e-mail the cabinet? and how has this been shared with the local population. I'd be interested in knowing how many people will use this function.

Answer Councillor Peter Smith - Council Leader (and Chairman of the Cabinet):

The consultation carried out by the Council met unfortunately with only a very small response. This amounted to less than 0.05% of the Council's electorate and as such could not be considered to be an accurate reflection of opinions. The consultation survey was only a consultation to assist the Council in making a decision and was not a binding referendum in any event. The Council took the view that there was no strong view against the current arrangements and considered that an elected Mayor was not appropriate as a model for Wigan.  

Question Reference Number: 33004

Question submitted on 5 November 2009 by: Eric Dickens

Re: Cabinet with strong Leader/elected Mayor

The recent survey showed that the majority of respondents favoured an elected Mayor. In view of this preference, when and how will the new Mayor be elected and what will be the procedure?

Answer Councillor Peter Smith - Council Leader (and Chairman of the Cabinet):

It is the case that the response received by the Council to the recent consultation was particularly disappointing in that less than 0.05% of the electorate took part and the result was not therefore considered to be a reliable reflection of the wider public opinion. Clearly we did not capture the public's attention on this occasion and we will need to consider different methods of consultation. The use of electronic voting is certainly one method under wider consideration in government agencies and this will remain under review by the Council. The consultation in relation to Executive arrangements was mainly advertised through Borough Life and costs were accordingly minimised and it is agreed that costs must be a factor in coming up with an effective method of consultation.  

Question Reference Number: 33122

Question submitted on 10 November 2009 by: Ann

Can you please tell me why our communal gardens get left for so long in between mows, and then get left looking like ploughed fields. loose grass everywhere and different lengths? it just looks such a mess. these are supposed to be our gardens, not fields. Plus the pathway at the front of our bungalows is usually overgrown with weeds, full of broken glass, overgrown trees, and rubbish.

Answer from Councillor J B Baldwin (Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Culture)

The grass area in question is scheduled to be moved on 16 occasions per year. The grass cutting operation usually takes place between the months of March and October and is carried out at 10 working day intervals, depending on weather conditions.

As is the case with most of the grass areas throughout the borough the grass os cut without collection, this is inline with agreed specifications and regarded as the most environmentally efficient way to mange grass.

I will try and investigate the quality issues you have raised and ensure that any corrective actions required are implemented in order that this area meets the required standards. I will also inform our colleagues at Wigan and Leigh Housing regarding the issue of weeds, rubbish, glass and the overgrown trees in order that they can consider an appropriate course of action,

Question Reference Number: 33310

Question submitted on 20 November 2009 by: N Worthington

Can you tell me why Wigan health authority have started charging blue badge holders for parking on hospital car parks. Especially when all people in Wales and Scotland get free parking at hospitals. from what I have read the government was supposed to be making hospital parking free for people in England and yet Wigan health authority have recently started charging blue badge holders who were previously exempt.

Answer:

The question falls under the remit of the Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh National Health Service Trust and I have been advised by that organisation that if you re direct your concerns to them on the following email address then they will offer a quick response to you:-

christine.swann@wwl.nhs.uk in the Chief Executive's office.

Question Reference Number: 33695

Question submitted on 9 December 2009 by: Mrs Moreau

I should like know the name of the Member of the European Parliament from Wigan (because I'm from one of your twinned cities).

Answer from Councillor Peter Smith - Council Leader (and Chairman of the Cabinet):

Wigan is part of the North West Regional Constituency of the European Parliament, there are eight MEP’s representing the region.

Wigan residents may contact any one of the eight MEP’s for the region with their queries.

The MEPs are:

• Rt. Hon. Sir Robert Atkins – Conservative Party
• Mrs Arlene McCarthy – Labour Party
• Mr Paul Nuttall – UK Independence Party
• Mr Chris Davies – Liberal Democrats
• Mr Sajjad Karim – Conservative Party
• Mr Brian Simpson – Labour Party
• Ms Jacqueline Foster – Conservative Party
• Mr Nick Griffin – British National Party

Further information and contact details for all the North West MEP’s can be found at,

Question Reference Number: 33752

Question submitted on 11 December 2009 by: Steven Garratt

Would the Cabinet consider allowing bus lanes to be used by motorcyclists, following the current trials that are being held in London?

Answer from Cabinet Portfolio holder for Environment and Regeneration (and Deputy Leader of the Council):

All Traffic Regulation Orders (such as Bus Lanes) must have their traffic signs and road markings as prescribed by the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002. Any departure from such regulation must obtain approval from the Department for Transport (DfT).

As stated in the request such provisions are currently being trailed in London. Following these trials, the DfT may make provision for motorcycle countrywide, however the results are being monitored and analysed and all the authorities in Greater Manchester will consider the full evidence base, once national provision is approved.

Question Reference Number: 33860

Question submitted on 17 December 2009 by: Peter Hampson

Is planning permission required for a conservatory?

Answer Cabinet Portfolio holder for Environment and Regeneration (and Deputy Leader of the Council):

Conservatories are considered extensions to a dwellinghouse in planning terms and are therefore subject to planning control. However, some extensions, including conservatories can be added to a dwellinghouse without the need for planning permission, under rights known as Permitted Development. There are limits and conditions that apply to whether an extension falls within Permitted Development. The council has a form which householders can complete, which will then allow officers to confirm if both planning permission and building regulation consent is required for an extension. This can be found at: www.wigan.gov.uk/Services/Planning/Residential/DoINeedPlanningPermission.htm

Information about permitted development can also be found on the Planning Portal website, which has a useful miniguide about extensions and interactive houses that allow a householder to check the permitted development allowances themselves. This can be found at the planningportal website (external link)

Question Reference Number: 34078

Question submitted on 30 December 2009 by: Sam Thompson

Why can traffic lights not be provided at the junction of Bradshaw St. and Whelley?

Answer from Councillor D T Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder Environment and Regneration (and Deputy Leader of the Council)

 Technically, it is possible to install traffic signals at any junction, however the feasibility of such proposals must be tested and justified through evidence collation and assessment. Traffic signals can be installed at junctions for the following reasons:

• to improve road safety;
• to regulate traffic flow demands and / or manage congestion and queuing;
• to give priority to public transport;
• to provide crossing facilities for pedestrians and cyclists; and
• to maximise or limit traffic flow.

Records indicate that at the junction in question, there has only been one accident resulting in a slight injury at this location in the last three years, therefore traffic signals cannot be justified on safety reasons.

Traffic flows on the B5238 Whelley are significant through the peak traffic periods and Bradshaw Street flows account for only 6% of overall traffic movements at this location. Traffic signals at this location would add further delays to this busy route, and therefore it cannot be justified on congestion / queue management grounds.

There is already a Pelican Crossing facility at this location to provide for pedestrian and cyclist crossing demand. Given the low side road demand, good road safety record and existing crossing facility the existing priority junction is the most appropriate method of control at this location.

Question Reference Number: 34243

Question submitted on 7 January 2010 by: Barry Cutler

Hello, I own a B2B Consultancy called Auditel. Established 15 years ago 150 industry specialists provide outsourced Independent Cost Management on a No Win No Fee basis, to over 3,000 SMEs. We cover most categories of Overhead, and provide permanent supplier management services on a performance fee basis. Clients save time and money on a risk free basis. I understand that you manage your purchasing internally, and run tenders. Would our service suit any part of your expenditure?

Answer from Councillor F B Walker - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Efficiency: 

The procurement of high quality goods and services is critical to Wigan’s delivery of public services. Our suppliers have a key role to play in this delivery and we therefore encourage competition, welcoming bids from both new and existing suppliers. A key criterion that we use to select a supplier is value for money, and whilst we cannot discriminate in favour of locality, we are committed to supporting local firms to compete for contracts.

As a local authority we are bound by three main regulatory strands that govern how we procure goods and services. These are European law, national guidance and our own local rules that are contained in the council’s constitution.

The details of this governance can be found on our website by following the link below:

wigan.gov.uk/Services/Business Regeneration/Council Procurement/

The following is a useful extract from that information:

Business and Tendering Opportunities

We have produced a Selling to the Council (172kb) guide that is intended to help prospective suppliers and contractors understand the various routes to supplying us.

The guide explains the procedure rules and European Union regulations we must follow when selecting goods and services. If you are interested to learn more about these rules you can view the Contracts Procedure Rules within our own Constitution and the UK's Office of Government Commerce website that states how European Union procurement rules affect us.

This hopefully explains why, as you note, we are required to manage our purchasing and run tenders the way we do. We have in the past and are currently employing Cost Management Consultants all of who have been engaged following the procedures described in the preceding information.

Question Reference Number: 34353

Question submitted on 13 January 2010 by: Neil Goldthorpe

Recent Snow And Bad Weather The recent snow and bad weather has caused a great deal of disruption across the country and with Wigan. This has raised several issues and I would like to raise these in two parts. a) Planning, Preparation and subsequent actions, During the recent and ongoing bad weather many people across the borough could not get to work or to do the normal everyday things like shopping or visiting people, simply because they could not either get out of their homes, the road and pavement conditions were to treacherous, to compound this public transport was cancelled. So either they could not attempt to drive, could not use alternative transport or there was gridlock due to accidents or roads being closed. Schools being closed also impacted on people unable to get to work because of short notice child care arrangements. What cost has this been to the borough?

Cancelled operations and clinics at hospitals slips falls, resulting in broken limbs reduced revenues to the council, parking fees etc possible closure of business because of lower sales increased costs to industry increased costs to the council, rubbish collections etc Does the council have a disaster committee or steering group? as it would appear to me and most people within the borough that we were completely unprepared for this. I live in Orrell and not one road or pavement was gritted throughout this period, resulting in some areas becoming impassable, after the snowfall had frozen overnight ice up to 2 inch formed. Church St and Winstanley road are major routes yet these were not pre-treated with grit, cleared of snow or afterwards.

If we as a borough are to ensure that life, business and revenue is to be maintained detailed planning must take place to ensure that we are well prepared prior to such events, during and afterwards. I know that resource is the key and that not everything can be done but taking key and measurable steps can ensure that the borough can with stand such events and have business as usual, such steps can and should attract business to the borough as they would see how well we cope with such events. For example was any of the steps below actioned:- Did we have a plan - do we have a plan? Do we know all the most strategic and important routes in and out of the borough, where these snow ploughed, gritted? (and what criteria is used to determine their importance, schools route, ambulance station, hospital, fire, public transport major artery?) Do we or have we sited grit bins in strategic locations, so that residents can grit the roads areas themselves Public transport - do we have contact - liaise with re-plan and communicate this? What actions do we take after such event - okay it happens and sometimes the snowfall could be very bad, but what actions are taken afterwards to recover the situation b)

For the most part, train services in and around Wigan continued, although some were cancelled and the rest delayed - this in most part because of the rolling stock used on the routes, - old diesel powered trains still have to be powered up by battery after being sat in a siding for most of the night in sub zero conditions. Routes serviced by electric powered trains had little or no disruption. This goes to highlight the need for the council to lobby hard for the electrification of the lines from Kirby to Wigan (extension of Mersey rail) and from Wigan to Manchester (metro link) this would make Wigan a major hub for transport as an exchange hub point - bringing untold benefits to the borough. Along with this and prior to this the borough should also lobby for increased parking at existing stations (this is a major reason for people not using the train) - this gives people the opportunity to drive a short distance around the borough and then catch a train for the longer journey. Also create new stations - the stations we currently used were planned and built 100 years ago - when the population and demographics were much different - Hag fold station is a good example of a new station being built - Along the Kirby - Wigan and Southport to Wigan there are numerous places that a new station could be built and help with congestion etc. Quick examples - Alexander Park and Robin PARK (football and Rugby?)

Answer Councillor D T Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder Environment and Regneration (and Deputy Leader of the Council)

Wigan Council does indeed operate a Winter Maintenance Operational Plan during the winter months, which is activated by trained staff who are informed directly by the Met office ‘Open Road’ forecasting system. During the recent severe weather, Wigan Council carried out winter maintenance treatment of the borough's strategic roads which include all A and B roads, all bus routes, Hospitals and Emergency services depots. There are 10 dedicated vehicles covering the whole borough, treating 430Km per treatment, during a 3hr time frame.

A specific set of weather events occurred and assisted by the road surface temperatures not reaching above minus 5 degrees for a total of 42 days running. This created an issue of moisture turning to ice on contact with the roads, and not defrosting as is the norm, even with the assistance of salt. Brine which is a by- product of treating the carriageways will freeze at minus 10 degrees and below, which on many occasions during this period, did happen. This led to roads such as Winstanley Rd and Church Lane, Orrell looking like they had not been treated, when in fact they had on many occasions.

Primarily, the borough suffered difficult conditions on the 5th January 2010 as a snow storm of a 1 in 50 year intensity fell across the Greater Manchester region in a short period of time. At this point the gritters had been out treating the primary network for earlier snow falls which were cleared from 9pm 4th January 2010. The snow was predicted by the Met office, but we were expecting to receive accumulation of 2-3cm; we actually received upto 50cm in places. At this point we fitted snow ploughs to our gritters and aimed to clear the primary routes whilst treating with salt from the rear. The levels of snow received and the velocity in which it dropped left some of the gritters inundated, and two occasions stuck themselves.

On the 5th January, the Chief Executive invoked the Council's Business Continuity Plan to ensure that the critical services could be maintained. The public transport system did stop all of its services on the 5th January, but many of the main services were running a limited service again on the 6th January, and back to full service on the 7th January, which is creditable. In addition, 90% of bus stops were cleared on the 5th and 6th of January, which was shown as a good example to other GM authorities for the speed and action taken to ensure public could get to work on public transport.

Many of the Councils operational workforces were redirected to clear strategic sites from day one of the snow, such as Hospitals, Schools, town centres, rail stations and care homes. There were a number of secondary schools that were having exams later that week, and we mobilised our corporate resources to ensure those building were open, so that those activities could commence unheeded. All schools were back open by Monday the 11th January.

The poor weather conditions have been a notional problem, which did lead to a national shortfall in the salt supply chain to all authorities. Wigan was no exception to these pressures but managed its salt responsibly. The decision not to fill salt bins was taken as a last resort, due to the main salt stocks being reserved for the primary network. Following all such events Wigan Council has learned some lessons from the past three months, and will be reviewing the Winter Maintenance Service, in preparation for next winter. With our limited resources we always endeavour to provide the most cost effective and responsive service possible, sometimes under the most difficult circumstances.

Train Performance in Cold Weather:

It is known that battery performance decreases with temperature but, once running, the heavier diesel units have better traction in slippery conditions than equivalent electric units.

The Case for Electrification:

The main advantage of electric traction over diesel power is that it has a higher power-to-weight ratio. This allows for lighter and faster traction units, with better acceleration. This improves journey times and increases line capacity. This is why modern, high-speed railways are all electrically powered. Also, as well as having no reliance on crude oil, the other environmental benefits are less noise and pollution.

The main disadvantage is the significant cost of investment required up front to electrify the line, as well as having to simultaneously replace all traction units. Therefore, routes with higher traffic densities make better candidates. However, the ongoing maintenance cost for rolling stock and infrastructure is less than operating a diesel network. Government has already announced the electrification of the line between Liverpool and Manchester. Other lines in this area are still undergoing detailed assessment to define the potential costs and benefits. These are the Manchester to Preston route (via Bolton), and the Wigan to Liverpool route (via Huyton).

Car Parking at Rail Stations:

To reduce congestion and pollution, Wigan Council wants to reduce the number of short journeys made by car. Therefore, whilst there may be some scope for modest increases in car parking, it has to be balanced against the potential for increasing local congestion further. This is why we are investing in more sustainable modes of transport to rail stations, such as walking, cycling, and travel by bus.

New and Improved Rail Stations:

In partnership with GMPTE, Network Rail and train operators, we are already improving existing stations. Buildings, lighting and other facilities are being refurbished or replaced, and real-time information is being added to keep passengers up-to-date with how their train is running. As with all decisions on major infrastructure, there needs to be a case made for additional rail stations. Whilst sports events can generate significant amounts of traffic, their impact is temporary and is unlikely to make a new station financially viable. This kind of short term transport would be better served by use of buses to interchange with existing stations.

Question Reference Number: 34442

Question submitted on 17 January 2010 by: Deborah Parry

I would like to know why I have to pay full council tax as i live on Garden Street in Tyldesley and we have no street lights which I presume some of the funds are contributed to?

Answer to follow in due course.

Question Reference Number: 34993

Question submitted on 9 January 2010 by: Tony Murray

I note with interest the portfolios of the cabinet members and, possibly due to my ignorance, cannot identify the person best to contact. I am looking to make contact with Wigan Council, and its representatives who are responsible, or engaging on Worklessness in the borough. I would be obliged if person/s engaged on the policy (not relating to HR or employees of Wigan Council) to make contact please.

Answer from Councillor D T Molyneux -  Cabinet Portfolio Holder Environment and Regneration (and Deputy Leader of the Council)

Economic Regeneration is the lead in this area of work.

The contact officers details are as follows:

Susan Gambles

Head of Regeneration Agency

Wigan Council

Environmental Services Department

Regeneration and Communities Division

Economic Regeneration Office

Gateway House 4

Standishgate

Wigan

WN1 1AE

Tel: (01942) 828934 or internal 3934

Fax: (01942) 828938 or internal 3938

www.wigan.gov.uk

www.wigan.gov.uk/r/worklessness

www.wigan.gov.uk/buylocal

Question Reference Number: 35836

Question submitted on 10 March 2010 by: Paul Maina

In the spirit of good faith, find attached responses to the question of PHV`S on bus lanes. Would you consider a TRIAL PHV`S USING BUS LANES? In the same spirit of fairness, if there was a debate on PHV`S on bus lanes I hope there can be an open minded approach in the discussion. Regards, Paul Maina.

PS:Maybe it`s about time for change. Power given back to the people to decide matters affecting them. Nobody has a final say without everybodys` opinion, that's why we vote. We live in a democracy not a dictatorial regime. If there was a referendum and locals, Phv drivers, Hospitals, Charities(with disabled individuals who use phv`s for travel) and other organisations that can benefit from PHV`S, was to be looked into....you never know what the power of everybody`s opinion can do.

All the best see below In Oxford City the bus lanes comes under Oxfordshire County Council. Hackneys have been allowed in the bus lanes for a number of years and about 18 months ago the County allowed Private hire vehicles in the lanes under a trail. As far as I am aware the trail is still on but I do not think they will overturn the decision as there has been no problems with them being in the lanes as Oxford City PhD's have Very clear signage that they are a licensed vehicle. Jill Cramer jcramer@oxford.gov.uk Licensing Officer.

Private Hire vehicles licensed with Cheltenham Borough Council can use bus lanes when displaying a bus lane approved sticker which can be purchased from the Licensing section at a charge of £2.35. If you require any further information please don't hesitate to contact me. Many Thanks Amelia Mercer Licensing Officer Licensing Section Public Protection Municipal Offices Cheltenham Borough Council 01242 264217

Good Afternoon Private Hire Drivers are permitted to use bus lanes, however we do not have bus lanes in the Forest. If driver's wish to drive into Gloucester for example where there are bus lanes then they can purchase a sticker which states that they are permitted to use bus lanes. Regards Heather Lucas Senior Environmental Protection and Licensing Officer Forest of Dean District Council Council Offices, High Street, Coleford, Glos. GL16 8HG * 01594 812410 * 01594 812590 * heather.Lucas@fdean.gov.uk

I can confirm that private hire vehicles are permitted to use bus lanes in Southampton and have for many years now.If I can be of any further help please get back to me. Simon Bell Principal Transport Planner (Public Transport) Planning and Sustainability Division Southampton City Council simon.bell@southampton.gov.uk tel 023 8083 3814 fax 023 8083 2516

Lewes District Council has a very limited amount of road designated as a bus lane. This is along the A259, South Coast Road leading into Brighton. As far as we are aware Private Hire vehicles are permitted to use this stretch of road. Regards Mary Hawes Assistant Hackney Carriage Licensing Officer Lewes District Council 01273 484276 Yes,

ph vehicles are allowed to use Bus Lanes in our Authority Regards Tracy Tracy.Evans@basingstoke.gov.uk

The answer in Hastings is yes they can. Bob Brown Licensing Manager Hastings Borough Council Aquila House Breeds Place Hastings East Sussex TN34 3UY Tel 01424 783249 Fax 01424 783208

I can confirm private hire vehicles are permitted to use the bus lanes within Bath. Please provide vehicle registration number to enable us to add your vehicle to the exemption list. Regards Teresa Cox Appeals Officer Parking Services Environmental Services Bath & North East Somerset Council Telephone: 01225 395093 Email: teresa_cox@bathnes.gov.uk

In Norwich we have amended statutory provisions for the regulation of use of bus lanes to allow for private hire vehicles with the proviso that they have fitted a roof top private hire sign. We recognise the valuable contribution private hire transport makes towards reducing the demand for private car use and the role they play in helping people get to health appointments etc. Regards Kieran Yates Transportation KieranYates@norwich.gov.uk

I attach a list of Bus Lane restrictions in Telford. The majority allow Private Hire access. Regards Nick Kitchen Traffic Engineer - Traffic and Transportation Planning and Transport Telford & Wrekin Council Darby House | PO Box 212 | Lawn Central | Telford | TF3 4JA Tel: 01952 384627 Email: nick.kitchen@telford.gov.uk Fax: 01952 384634 telford.gov.uk (external link)

The answer is yes and no. Private Hire Vehicles can use the bus lanes if they are in possession of a permit. These are obtainable from the District Council for the area. I do not know the eligibility criteria. Regards Susan James Customer Services, Devon County Council Customer Service Centre Roads & Transport Team - Mailbox" csc.roads@devon.gov.uk

I can confirm that private hire taxis are entitled to use the bus lane provided that the vehicle is displaying all the relevant plates to identify it as a taxi and it is actually being used for business at the time and not personal use. Regards Kelly Friend Acting Representations & Appeals Team Leader Planning & Transport Parking Services Liverpool City Council | Municiple Buildings | Liverpool | L69 1JB Tel: 0151 233 3011 fax: 0151 233 2384 web: liverpool.gov.uk (external link)

I can confirm that private hire vehicles are permitted to use the bus lanes in Wirral. Regards Phil Black, Enforcement Manager Wirral Council Tel. 0151 606 2271 philblack@wirral.gov.uk Visit our website: www.wirral.gov.uk I refer to your email to the Customer Service Centre regarding the use of Private Hire vehicles in Bus lanes.

In Newcastle we have very few Bus lanes, the majority of our priority lanes being No Car Lanes. All taxis, whether Private Hire of hackney are allowed to use these lanes. There are a couple of Bus lanes which also have an exemption for Taxis, and PHV's are also allowed to use these eg. Great North Road, Tyne Bridge Slip roads. There are other Bus Only restrictions in Newcastle which do not have any exemption for taxis e.g Blackett street, Side/sandhill Regards Keith Taylor Principal Engineer Environment & Regeneration Directorate Website www.newcastle.gov.uk Technical Services Tel +44 0191 211 6145 Newcastle upon Tyne City Council Fax +44 0191 211 4843 Civic Centre Mob 07967 394329 Barras Bridge e-mail ktay@newcastle.gov.uk Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8PD

I can confirm that Licensed Hackney Carriages and Private hire Vehilces are permitted to use the Bus Lanes in Warrington. Regards Phil Barnes Hackney/Private Hire Licensing Officer Warrington Borough Couuncil Passenger Transport Unit Business Support Centre New Town House Buttermarket Street Warrington WA1 2NH Tel 01925 442517 Fax 01925 442623 Email pbarnes@warrington.gov.uk

Taxis and Private Hire vehicles are allowed to use bus lanes in Cheltenham because they are considered to fulfill part of the public transport system. They are not however allowed to use the 'bus-only' gate into High Street.

Answer from Councillor D T Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder Environment and Regneration (and Deputy Leader of the Council)

The current Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions (TSRGD) only permit the signing of buses, taxis and cycles in 'with-flow' bus lanes; taxis cannot be signed in contra-flow bus lanes. To permit Private Hire Vehicles (PHV's) in bus lanes would require authorisation from the Secretary of State. This has been achieved in some local authority areas (locally, Warrington ).

The principal impact of allowing taxis or PHVs in bus lanes is that any pick-up or drop-off activity disrupts the use of the bus lane by others. In with-flow lanes, buses, cycles and other taxis/PHVs may have to change lanes, perhaps suddenly, to negotiate a stopping/stopped vehicle. In contra-flow bus lanes, this would be an offence (travelling the wrong way on a one-way street).

PHVs are less identifiable than taxis in that they have no vehicle markings (i.e. ' TAXI ' on the roof). The licence plate is too small to be read on a moving PHV, giving the impression to other drivers that it may be just another private car. This is the view of the ten district authorities of Greater Manchester and the Greater Manchester Integrated Transport Authority (GMITA).

The ten Greater Manchester districts and GMITA/GMPTE coordinate policy on bus lanes across the whole county. This is to reduce confusion and give drivers consistency, especially where bus lanes cross administrative boundaries. Consequently, any change in policy would need unanimous support.

A paper was presented to the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities (AGMA) in 2003, proposing a livery for PHVs across the whole of Greater Manchester to identify them properly in bus lanes. The principle of a livery was rejected by the trade bodies, so the proposal at that time was shelved. However this is a matter that will be raised again with Traffic Managers from other Greater Manchester Councils to consider whether an experimental trial would be appropriate. Such trial would require the approval of the Department for Transport on behalf of the Secretary of State.

In summary, regulations do not currently allow PHVs in bus lanes. Authorisation could be obtained from the Secretary of State but we would have to demonstrate how PHVs would be identified for the benefit of other drivers and for enforcement purposes. This matter needs to be considered across AGMA a will therefore be raised at the next meeting of the AGMA Traffic Managers.

Question Reference Number: 36138

Question submitted on 17 March 2010 by Mr R Johnson

Why all the fancy titles which do not relate to services as the public know then?

Answer from Councillor Peter Smith - Council Leader (and Chairman of the Cabinet):

The Cabinet is the council's main decision making body and each of the ten Cabinet members carries a broad area of responsibility encompassing several council services. To keep the titles of their portfolios concise for every-day use, these are chosen with the aim of capturing a meaningful description of the portfolio in a few words. In order to aid understanding of what services each porfolio covers, a slightly longer explanation is also included on relevant documentation (such as the Cabinet webpage www.wigan.gov.uk/Services/CouncilDemocracy/CommitteesCabinetPanels/Cabinet/).

 Question Reference Number: 36493

Question submitted on 25 March 2010 by Adrian Hardy.

Wigan Council proposal to install traffic lights at Boars Head/Chorley Road junction Considerations in favour of the traffic lights are far outweighed by those against and the council are strongly urged not to invest in these lights but to save their funds at this time of economic restraint, for more urgent action elsewhere in the borough, e.g. filling in of potholes, or for non-traffic related activities for which there is growing demand. CAN CABINET PLEASE EXPLAIN JUST WHY THIS PROPOSAL WILL BE EFFECTIVE?

Considerations in Favour 1. In the morning rush hour (08.00 -09.00) during the school term a tailback of traffic is generated in both Chorley Road and Wigan Road approaching the mini-roundabout. This tends to be most evident from 08.30 onwards when traffic tailing back from Woodfield School pedestrian crossing reaches the Boars Head, making it difficult for traffic to get into the roundabout. It is not clear just how installing traffic lights would assist in removing the tailback of traffic from Woodfield School.

2. In the evening rush hour (17.15 -18.00) there can be tailbacks from the mini-roundabout back down Wigan Lane to the Cherry Gardens. However this is does continue to move slowly and as neither Chorley Road, nor Wigan Road north of the Boars Head tend to have congestion, once the traffic gets past the Boars Head it is flowing freely. It is not clear just how installing traffic lights would assist in removing the tailback of traffic from the Boars Head.

Considerations Against 1. Excluding the rush hours, there is no congestion at the Boars Head junction for 22.25 hours per day in the week and 24 hours a day at the weekend. The traffic flows smoothly, traffic does not have to stop un-necessarily and therefore does not waste fuel whilst queuing or stopping, nor create driver frustration from having to stop for a red light when there is no traffic actually moving in the junction. Such frustration is likely to increase further at night when little traffic is around but drivers still have to stop whilst the sequence of the lights changes. Local residents will also experience an increase in noise as cars rev up, lorries move off from the junction and they also screech to a halt as the lights change! This increase in noise will be most noticeable during the night! The unpredictability of the queues is such that as I look out of my window at 3 Chorley Road at 08.50 on 25/3 there is no queue at all at the junction, everything is flowing smoothly. Were there traffic lights here now traffic would be stopped on at least one arm of the junction/.

2. The banning of a right turn from Chorley Road toward Standish would mean more traffic going up Rectory Lane, round the church and down Church Street if it wanted to get to say Roundmoor Road or Greenways. The Alternative, as used during recent roadworks, is to cut across the garage forecourt, posing a danger to users of the garage and adding to congestion in the traffic queue on Wigan Road as motorist try to emerge from the garage into a flow of northbound traffic.

3. The banning of the right turn from Chorley Road would mean that over-height HGVs that could not use Rectory Lane would have a long detour to make, e.g. down to the Cherry Gardens roundabout and back up again, or via Chorley itself. It is only recently that the sawmill near Chorley ceased making large roof trusses which, when loaded on lorries, were too high to go up Rectory Lane. School buses progressing up to Standish High School also turn right at this junction, so consideration needs to be given to re-routing them.

4. If the garage is to remain open then the accesses to both Wigan Road and Chorley Road are needed for it to function and rat-running is inevitable.

5. If the garage is to remain open then consideration needs to be given as to how the petrol tankers gain access - at present they come from Standish, do a complete turn of the mini-roundabout and then enter the garage via the entry point on the roundabout itself. Such a move would not be possible with traffic lights and the tankers would have to come through Wigan itself. This entry point might also need to be made for "entry only", since exiting traffic already poses problems on the roundabout - but it is not clear how such an exit ban would be enforced.

6. Traffic levels in Chorley Road have increased in recent years in part because of drivers trying to avoid Whelley and Scholes, where traffic lights have exacerbated the traffic congestion and slowed the flow of traffic rather than making journeys quicker. There is no reason to expect traffic lights at the Boars Head to be any more effective than those in Whelley.

7. Traffic levels have increased throughout the country in recent years, so the experience in Chorley Road/Wigan Road is not unique. Increasing capacity (which there is no guarantee the traffic lights would) is likely only to encourage more drivers to try a diversion via Chorley Road instead of Whelley and Scholes.

8. The installation and maintenance of the lights will cost far more than a repair of the current mini-roundabout and will add to congestion - therefore it is hard to see any Value for Money justification for such an installation at a time when the council has a reduced budget and growing needs to fund areas related to social care for children and older people.

9. Whilst we have not seen the potential signal phasing it is possible to consider what impact this might have on traffic turning into Chorley Road from the south.

a. Phase A - Wigan Road runs south; Wigan Road runs north - as soon as a northbound car wants to turn into Chorley Road it will be prevented from doing so by the southbound flow of traffic; the railway bridge is too narrow to take three lanes of traffic, so all the northbound traffic would come to a halt during this phase of the lights. You have details of the turning movements at this junction so will be able to model how often the traffic moving north would grind to a halt

b. Phase B - Chorley Road runs south, Wigan Road runs north - providing there is no tailback of traffic from Woodfield in the morning then there should be a free flow for traffic moving both north and south at this time. However traffic emerging from the garage into Wigan Road would have to use this time to emerge and cut across the stationary line of traffic waiting at the lights, a difficult move since their sight lines would be impeded by the queuing traffic and when they did emerge would hold up the northbound traffic flow making the junction less efficient than would otherwise the be projected in your modelling.

c. Phase C would be needed if Chorley Road traffic was allowed to turn right and I can see why you are not keen on this since the down time in the junction would be increased.

d. Not having sight of your phasing times it is not clear what level of tidal flow would be built into any lights here - one is clearly needed given the strong morning and evening peaks. In the evening Phase B would need to be given more time in order to allow the northbound traffic out of Wigan to clear, so it is possible that southbound traffic on Wigan Road coming down to the Boars Head would find they have more congestion than at present.

e. Throughout the day each time a vehicle arrived at an arm of the junction the lights would be triggered and some downtime be applied to each traffic flow. When the number of vehicles involved is minimal, say 3, then the time the lights will be on red for other arms of the junction far exceeds the time taken to clear the junction and there will be considerable amounts of time wasted for all traffic whilst the lights move through their red and amber phases.

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio holder for Environment and Regeneration (and Deputy Leader of the Council):

There are a number of key and important issues which you raise. We hope that you find the information below a useful response to these important issues and, at the relevant time when this matter comes forward for a decision, we will ensure that the points you raise are fully taken into account.

It was announced in 2006 that up to £60 million will be available over four years through the Congestion Performance Fund (CPF) to encourage and incentivise the local authorities in 10 urban areas to outperform their own 2010-11 Local Transport Plan 2 congestion targets, on which the Department for Transport’s national indicator is based (NI 167 Congestion – average journey time per mile during the morning peak). The funding is 50% capital, 50% revenue and can only be used to influence travel behaviour on the Congestion Monitored Routes and is non-transferable. In Wigan’s case this is the A49 inbound between Standish and Wigan. Greater Manchester (GM) has already received £2.483 million from the fund. Since 2006 there has been investment along the route to improve traffic flow. Measures have included the creation of two inbound lanes along Central Park Way, improved direction signing and Personal Travel Planning for residential properties along the route

In March 2009, a Route Appraisal & Potential Scheme Opportunities study was undertaken on the A49 Congestion Monitoring Route. The following two locations where highlighted as high priority in terms potential for the introduction of schemes with high congestion reducing potential:

(1) Pedestrian crossing adjacent to St Clements Road – significant delays caused by permanent crossing demand outside Woodfield Primary School.; and

(2) Boars Head roundabout - where significant delays are caused to southbound traffic giving priority to northbound traffic turning right into Chorley Road.

The first congestion hot spot has been addressed this financial year through the upgrade of the Pelican crossing to a Puffin and introduction of dynamic traffic control MOVA (Microprocessor Optimised Vehicle Actuation). If successful, this bid would allow the second congestion hot spot to be prioritised for engineering measures, through the implementation of a scheme to upgrade the existing Boars Head roundabout (A49 Wigan Road / A5106 Chorley Road) to a signalised junction. This scheme has been recommended for attention through the annual LTP capital programme, however it has not been prioritised to date, in this or previous financial years, because of the comparative assessment against other priority schemes recommended on other corridors across the Borough.

The CPF provides an opportunity to introduce engineering measures to help relieve this congestion hot spot and complement the infrastructure measures that have been put in place on this corridor to help reduce congestion and promote alternative modes of travel e.g. bus lanes, bus stop reviews, on road cycle facilities, shared use cycle facilities, cycle signage, improved road markings, MOVA at pedestrian crossings, and Personalised Travel Planning (PTP). On completion of this final engineering scheme at Boars Head Roundabout, it is felt that infrastructure measures along this particular corridor will be exhausted.

The three arm junction - Boars Head roundabout, has peak hour congestion concerns resulting from southbound traffic giving way to northbound traffic turning right into Chorley Road. This right turn is particularly high (44%) during the morning peak, and therefore this has implications for the southbound through movements.

The current and proposed junction arrangements have been modelled using Transport Research Laboratory software to test the capacity implications. The roundabout model for the existing junction layout shows the southbound arm to have a delay of almost 6 minutes per vehicle between 08.30 and 08:45 with a queue of 70 vehicles. The traffic signal model for the has been undertaken by Greater Manchester Urban Traffic Control (GMUTC), and has assumed a worst case scenario with the pedestrian phase being called every cycle: in reality, this would not be the case. The traffic signal model shows the delay reduced to 35 seconds per vehicle and a queue reduction to 25 vehicles.

As the site would run under MOVA control, GMUTC have advised that they would expect the actual results to be better than those predicted using the traffic signal model.

Currently the proposals are in the very early stages and no public consultation has taken place. No decision has yet been made regarding any banned movements at this junction. The Traffic Group are fully aware of the implications of banning certain movements on Principal Routes and the implications this will have on certain vehicles and the petrol filling station.

You are correct to state that there is some transfer in traffic between the B5238 Whelley and the A5106 Chorley Road. However, this works both ways with traffic transferring to Whelley to avoid unplanned and planned events on Chorley Road. You are also correct to state that traffic levels have increased nationally over the last ten years (3.2%) there has also been and increase over the conurbation of Greater Manchester (1.8%). However, in Wigan there has been a decrease (-1.25%) in road traffic over the same period.

With regard to the staging of proposed traffic signals initial testing indicates that certain movements can operate at the same time to increase overall capacity. This includes the left turn from Chorley road to operate under priority control rather than signal control therefore flowing at all times.

As stated earlier the proposals are in the very early stages and once finalised will follow a detailed consultation to ensure all users are fully briefed and understand the benefits of such a scheme. Tackling congestion is one of the most important issues and the Council aims to address known congestion routes throughout the Borough. Opportunities for funding from Central Government must not be missed to maximise the benefits on the road network.

Question Reference Number: 36556

Question submitted on 28 March 2010 by: Peter Fleetwood.

What CRM system will the council be implementing? Will the council be providing bi-directional integration between the CRM and back office transactional systems? If integration is being planned which back office systems will be integrated? Will it be possible to close a service request in a back office system and the CRM will be automatically updated with the information. What are the total costs of the CRM implementation, licences, integration, hardware, number of users, etc What if any Gershon savings have been calculated as a result of this project and how are they broken down?

Answer from Councillor Chris Ready  - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for improvement:

Wigan Council has already implemented a CRM system from Northgate. We are currently developing the system in line with our customer transformation programme. Wherever possible it is the intention to fully integrate our back office systems into the CRM. Current plans are to integrate Northgate SX3, Northgate Revenues and Benefits system, Caps ESRI Mapping, Caps LLPG, Civica APP, Civica W2 plus our in-house systems.

In some cases it will be possible to close off service requests in a back office system and this will be fully determined as we look at each back office integration into the CRM.

In terms of total costs, this is difficult to fully establish at present as the integration of back office systems is currently programmed in and dependent on the level of integration achieved this will obviously drive the costs of implementation, licenses etc.

Gershon savings have been calculated at £437,000 which formed part of the 2010/11 budget proposals reported to Cabinet on 18th February 2010. This will be achieved by shifting the contact channels where possible from face to face to telephone and e communication.

Question Reference Number: 37022

Question submitted on 9 April 2010 by James McCann.

When will a detailed response to question no. 36493 from Adrian Hardy be given? There is no indication on the site as to when the question was submitted. I agree with the majority of the points made by Mr Hardy and would ask what studies has Mr Molyneux seen that convince him that the proposed traffic lights would ease conjestion? My own view is that conjestion would increase not decrease. I live on Chorley Road and to have no right turn into it will involve significant expence over time in increased fuel costs. When multiplied with the number of residents in Chorley Road who would be similarly inconvenienced and out of pocket the sums of money would be considerable. This when the national government is asking us to drive less! Are we to be compensated if this scheme is approved?

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio holder for Environment and Regeneration (and Deputy Leader of the Council):

The answer to the question no. 36493 will be posted on the web site today, 14 April 2010 and the issues raised in your question are contained within the response to Mr Hardy. Ref no 36493.

Question Reference Number: 37121

Question submitted on 13 April 2010 by Arthur Fairhurst

Why is it when councilors get gifts over £25 they can just write in the gift book over £25 why not the full amount?

Answer from Councillor Fred Walker - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Efficiency:

The requirement for Members to register gifts or hospitality worth £25 or over received in connection with official duties as a Member arises from the provisions of the Members Code of Conduct. Often it can be difficult for a member to estimate the value of any gift or hospitality and the general advice is that if there is a doubt as to the value then it should be registered on the basis that it might be worth £25 or more. There would be nothing to prevent a Member registering an estimated value of a figure above £25 if they know that it has that higher value and some Members do that but there is no specific requirement on Members to include such a higher estimate.

Question Reference Number: 37447

Question submitted on 24 April 2010 by Trina Johnson

Hi my son is 17 years old and is at the moment doing an I.T course at Leigh college, Railway Road. He doesn't like this course and has opted to do a training course from home which is costing £130 a month, i work part time and my partner is claiming incapacitiy benefit due to an operation so we are struggling like mad as my son has tried relentlasly to get a job so he has opted to stay in college but change courses. We have made many phone calls and spoke to advisors who were not helpful at all. So my question to you is, what can we do to help him change courses or get a grant to help pay for his home study course? As we are getting ourselves in debt to pay the bills and we need some advice n help .... kind regards trina and paul johnson

Answer from Councillor Mrs Susan Loudon - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children and Young People:

The Executive Director of Children and Young People Services, Nick Hudson will respond to the question by liaising directly with the individual, in view of the personal circumstances involved..

Question Reference Number: 37648

Question submitted on 3 May 2010 by Peter Harmer

I read with interest in a local newspaper a response from the traffic engineer with responsibility for the Hindley area, relating to the ongoing traffic congestion problems affecting Hindley Town Centre. We were informed that the installation of new software to control the automatic traffic signals in the town would vastly improve the flow of traffic through Hindley. How wrong could this be......Over the last couple of months, it is not unusual for traffic to be backed up from the Wigan side over Birkett Bank in Scholes,and Darlington Street East, all the way thorugh to Hindley. Furthermore, the traffic jams have got considerably longer along Liverpool Road, and Atherton Road, and it is not unusual to have vehicles in a 'jam' up to 2 miles from the centre of Hindley town centre (Castle Hill Road and Hall Lane) When are the engineers going to have a good, long, hard look at the problems, and come up with a solution to these worsening issues? I challenge any of the cabinet or traffic engineers to attempt to travel from Wigan to Leigh, via Hindley at any time of the day in less than 45 minutes....a journey that should take a maximum of 20 minutes. It is little wonder that Hindley town centre has become a centre of empty shops, take-aways and charity shops...classic signs of a town in decline. Sort out the taffic, and prosperity will return, and those passing through MAY decide to come back rather than avoid the place !

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux- Cabinet Portfolio holder for Environment and Regeneration (and Deputy Leader of the Council):

Thank you for submitting your question to the Cabinet regarding the congestion being experience in Hindley Town Centre.

As you will appreciate, there is no easy answer to the problem of congestion, in Hindley or across the Borough. The Council has placed a high priority on tacking congestion and is actively taking measures to keep traffic throughout the Borough flowing. However, the evidence shows that increased car usage means that we are subjected to a heavier traffic demand than the existing road network can accommodate. Our network is also constrained by the historical growth pattern of the Borough which means that many of our principle routes are along tight linear corridors flanked by residential properties. This makes highway widening schemes to increase capacity very difficult to achieve.

Hindley Town Centre has recently undergone safety and accessibility improvements following substantial consultation with the local community. The scheme implemented was a result of community engagement and represents a compromise to ensure that pedestrian safety is balanced with accessibility improvements. However, owing to the nature of the crossroads as a junction of a number of principle routes, the scheme implemented cannot resolve the congestion related concerns.

An earlier scheme, gyratory in nature, was subject to community consultation also and may have helped resolve some of the congestion concerns through the removal of conflicting turning movements at the junctions. However, this in balancing all of the benefits of the schemes this alternative was not favoured.

We are continually monitoring and reviewing possibilities for improving congestion on all our strategic corridors, including those that cross within Hindley Town Centre. This may result to some minor works being undertaken, including the crossroads. However, the major potential solutions that will have an impact on tackling congestion involve involve significant public expenditure (a Hindley bypass - A5225), considerable land take and alternative routing of traffic, or significant behavioural change (modal shift away from car usage).

Against the current significant reduction in public spending the Council has limited scope to provide a bypass for Hindley. Simply, the options available to us are to significantly increase capacity or significantly reduce demand. The Council has a number of initiatives aimed at reducing car travel including working with the Passenger Transport Executive to maximise the opportunity to use public transport and providing opportunities to cycle or walk to destinations. To be successful these initiatives rely on significant changes to the way the community chooses to travel which is difficult to achieve in the short term.

At the present time, it is clear that there is no solution that will resolve the problems at Hindley crossroads. However, within the current limitations of resources and the physical alignment of our routes, the Council is developing proposals to make the network as efficient as it can as well as promoting schemes to travel by other means than the car.

Question Reference Number: 37954

Question submitted on 12 May 2010 by A Bradbury.

Why on advertised legal notices published in the local press can you not spell GOLBORNE? Re : disposal of land in Golborne. This is not a one off as a few of your notices have been spelt wrong.

Answer from Councillor Fred Walker - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Efficiency:

The Council does endeavour to eliminate any spelling errors from documentation and particularly from public notices. There has been an error in relation to the spelling of Golborne in a notice and this is regretted. It clearly was not intended as a slight on the area or on the residents of Golborne.

Question Reference Number: 37955

Question submitted on 12 May 2010 by A Bradbury.

Why when we voted last week did we not vote for a full set of council seats ? (or why did we only get to vote for one councillor instead of the three from our ward)? Why stage the voting over three years?

Answer from Councillor Fred Walker - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Efficiency:

Wigan borough is divided into 25 wards with each ward represented by three Councillors. Each year one Councillor from each ward is elected to serve for a term of four years. There are no elections in the fourth year. This cycle of elections applies to all metropolitan Councils and is decided upon by the government, which takes regular advice from the Electoral Commission as to whether any alternative cycles of election better suit local Councils. The alternative of having metropolitan Council elections only every four years for all Council seats, has not been supported by the government. One advantage of the "election by thirds" sytem is that voters have the opportunity to exercise their vote (and therefore influence who represents them) most years rather than only once every four years.

Question Reference Number: 38128

Question submitted on 20 May 2010 by M Bradbury.

In addition to question 37648 "Hindley Traffic"....The problem with the traffic in Hindley is that there is little room for vehicles to turn right onto Liverpool Road at the main crossroads, so therefore if a vehicle is turning right the traffic directly behind cannot move and a queue is formed which develops into a major jam up of the area, together with the Tesco lights ,this is the problem,,,No right filter and tesco lights being too close to the main crossroads.Then add the fact that the council yard is situated between hindley Town centre and Ince Park, the afternoon jam could be relieved a little( because at least 40 or so bin wagons and paper vehicles all use that route as they empty their loads at recycling centre near morrisons, all heading back to yard at same time.. As for alternative methods of travel,when will authorities learn,they are wasting time and money on this issue,nobody is interested in alternatives.If you have a car,you will use it.How many bags of shopping can you get on a bike or bus?

Response from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Regeneration:

Thank you for your recent enquiry regarding the junction of Wigan Road / Liverpool Road, Hindley. This junction has a large proportion of right turning traffic from Wigan Road into Liverpool Road. You are quite correct to state that this is one of the major causes of delays for traffic travelling along the A577 as turning traffic often blocks the through movement. There are limited opportunities to widen this junction to form two dedicated lanes. If two lanes were formed the left turn from Liverpool Road into Wigan Road by an articulated vehicle would be compromised due to a vehicle waiting on Wigan Road to turn right.

The Traffic team however are looking at a number of options to free up movements at this junction, including the option of widening.

Tackling congestion is one of the most important issues and the Council aims to address this and other known congestion routes throughout the Borough.

Question Reference Number: 38161

Question submitted on 20 May 2010 by John Gurhy

 Dear cabinet, I am a resident of Wigan, I have a disability, ATAXIA, and this affects balance and coordination and means that I rely on aids to get around. I am right in saying that services provided for able bodied should also be available to disabled, in reality this does not occur. Many instances exist where access to basic rights and needs are denied to the disabled, I.e. older shops, pubs, banks, parks, green heart etc.

1. Will the cabinet assist me in my quest for equality and disabled access to leisure facilities and other basic needs services, within the borough of Wigan.

2. Will the cabinet ask the Council to put into practice and enforce, policy and procedures, rather than make the right noises in a document in order to seem to comply with any current legislation. In the hope that no one will ever challenge them.

3. Will the cabinet ask the council comply with the DDA with all new fixtures and fittings, to review all existing barriers/gates/stiles, removing or altering those that do not comply in order to secure lawful access for the disabled community?

4. Will the cabinet ask the Council ensure all new business/enterprises plan and build in disabled access/facilities before obtaining a licence to trade/operate/proceed.

5. Will the cabinet ask the Council ensure that all existing licence holders/traders provide a statement of accessibility to the council, for their premises, when re-applying for a licence to trade?

6. Will the cabinet ask the Council monitor all businesses/enterprises to ensure they comply with 4+5?

7. Will the cabinet ask the Council revoke licenses to any businesses/enterprises that do not comply with 4+5?

8. If the cabinet disagrees with any of the above can you reassess your Access for All supplementary planning documents which states "an accessible environment benefits everyone, especially people with disabilities, older people and families with young children? It is more cost effective and results in a more attractive design, if the environment is made accessible to all at the start rather than having to make adjustments later.

Response from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Regeneration:

The Council takes its responsibilities under the Disability Discrimination Act very seriously and attempts to make all service provision accessible and compliant with the provisions of the Act. We have worked closely with Mr Gurhy directly and through the Local Access Forum to address some of the specific issues that he has raised with officers in the past in relation to access to our countryside sites. We are more than happy to continue to do this.

The Disability Discrimination Act does though have limitations as it does not place responsibility with the Council or give it any powers to enforce the requirements of the Act on other organisations (such as shops, pubs, banks, etc.) that provide services in the Borough. The Act specifically gives an individual the right, if they feel discriminated against, to request that the service provider makes reasonable adjustments to allow them to use the service. If the service provider does not do this they must be able to show that their failure to do this is justified. If the individual is not satisfied with this they have recourse to the Equality and Human Rights Commission to request that they take up the case on their behalf.

To help deliver the key objectives of the Greenheart Regional Park an Access Strategy and Action Plan has been developed. The aim of the strategy is to promote and improve access to green spaces in Wigan for all, including people with disabilities, while improving their recreational use and appearance. Securing funding is obviously crucial to implement and manage projects and we are exploring opportunities through the Rights of Way Improvement Programme, Local Transport Plan and Active Travel Strategy to enable and encourage more people to access Wigan's countryside.

Barriers / access controls are in the majority of instances the responsibility of the landowner. When the Rights of Way Team are aware that a barrier / access control needs to be replaced the Team tries to identify the landowner and works with them to agree the best option. The procedure followed will be that identified within the new guidance document 'Accessibility on Public Rights of Way and Council land in Wigan', as approved by the Local Access Forum.

In addition, many of our countryside sites and other extensive public open spaces contain concessionary routes which we endeavour to make accessible to all users. However they are often vulnerable to misuse by motorcyclists, quad bikes and 4x4 vehicles. Such abuse presents clear public safety issues to be addressed and so, the Council, in extreme cases, is required to try to control this anti-social behaviour by installing suitable barriers. Unfortunately, this can restrict access to other users. However, the general presumption by the Council is that barriers to access will not be used unless absolutely necessary.

Any new barrier / access control will need authorisation from the Council and again the procedures as outlined in the guidance document will be followed to consider the full impact on all user groups with particular attention to disabled users.

With regard to the points concerning the role of licensing regulations to require businesses such as shops, pubs and banks to ensure their premises are accessible, the Council considered this issue formally in November 2009 when reviewing its Licensing Policy. It was noted that there was separate legislation to cover disability issues and that they didn’t fall within the scope of the Licensing Act.

The Council has adopted a Supplementary Planning Document "Access for All". This relates specifically to new development which requires planning permission. All new development requiring planning permission should comply with this document. Planning applications are assessed to ensure that they do comply and the Council has enforcement powers to ensure that happens. However there are many developments, including many gates and barriers, that do not require planning permission and so the Council does not have the same planning control over these; just the power of persuasion. We do expect that they should meet the principles of the Supplementary Planning Document when new provision is undertaken as part of a Council initiative. The Council does not have powers to apply this retrospectively to existing development or businesses. The Council also has powers under Building regulations to secure disabled access to new development.  

Question Reference Number: 38306

Question submitted by Dawn Hatton on the 25 May 2010.

What is the council going to do about the education of the remaining pupils at Hesketh Fletcher High school as pupils and staff are already on the decline where are the finances going to come from to educate the children that are left behind?

Answer from Councillor Susan Loudon - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children's Services:

The local authority will provide support to the Governors of Hesketh Fletcher during the process of transition in order that they are able to act in the best interests of the children.

At a recent joint transition meeting it was agreed that a local authority officer will assist the Headteacher and Governors by co-ordinating curriculum supportive measures between three adjacent schools and Hesketh Fletcher. As the school is planned to close in two years time, in August 2012, these measures should be effective in the intervening period.

Finance officers from the local authority are also working with the school to identify resources to ensure the quality of education for the pupils is maintained in the years before closure.

 Question Reference Number: 38388

Question sumitted by C Tsang on the 29 May 2010.

I have a genuine concern about a safety issue concering a road in the borough "Park Road WN6 7" I run a chippy on that road and the road has room for parking at one side of the road only. for the past few years i have seen near misses of cars nearly hitting people trying to cross the road, not due to the fact that they are not careful but their vision is restricted by a large commerical van parked outside the row of shops in the road. What can the council do to improve the safety of other road users on this matter as its a matter of time before a child is killed for not able to see an on coming vehicle.

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Regeneration:

Thank you for your recent enquiry relating to a large commercial vehicle parked on Park Road causing a road safety issue for pedestrians crossing the highway.

Observations have now been carried out by the Traffic team and they have not observed parking in this area by a commercial vehicle. Commercial vehicles are over 7.5 tonnes and are required to be stored at a registered premises when not in use. Large vehicles, such as transit vans may park on the highway where restrictions are not present and it may be this type of vehicle that relates to your concern as they can limit the visibility of pedestrians from other road users.

The only solution to prevent such parking would be to introduce waiting restrictions on the highway. This would however have a direct impact on parking for residents and businesses in the immediate area.

The Council will continue to monitor parked vehicles along Park Road. However, you may wish to contact Kevin Hargreaves, on 01942 404311, with the evidence you have if there is an issue here. Thereafter we will consider promoting a traffic regulation order to prevent parking at this location.

Question Reference Number: 38646

Question submitted by John Gurhy on the 5 June 2010.

Additional questions prompted by the response to Question Reference Number: 38161

1. If the council takes disability seriously and the DDA has limitations, as it does not place responsibility with the Council or give it any powers to enforce the requirements of the Act on other organisations (such as shops, pubs, banks, etc.) that provide services in the Borough. Why can the council not assume powers; by stipulating that businesses must provide disabled access/facilities as part of the conditions of gaining/retaining a license to trade?

2. In the statement (any powers to enforce the requirements of the Act on other organisations) Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Regeneration: admits that service providers have requirements under the act, In granting a license, is the licensing authority ( the council) not a service provider and therefore subject to the act and it's requirements?

3. We as disabled feel discriminated against, by the very fact that services are being denied to us. We ask the council (the service provider) to make the stipulation, mentioned above, as a reasonable adjustment. If the service provider (the council) does not do this, are they able to show that their failure to do this is justified?

4. With regard to the point concerning the role of licensing regulations to require businesses such as shops, pubs and banks to ensure their premises are accessible, the Council considered this issue formally in November 2009 when reviewing its Licensing Policy. It was noted that there was separate legislation to cover disability issues and that they didn't fall within the scope of the Licensing Act. Can the cabinet Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Regeneration: in particular as he answered, in the first instance, enlighten me on this separate legislation to cover disability issues?

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Regeneration:

The Council takes its responsibilities under the Disability Discrimination Act very seriously and attempts to make all service provision accessible and compliant with the provisions of the Act. As noted previously in response to question #38161, however, the Disability Discrimination Act does have limitations as it does not place responsibility with the Council or give it any powers to enforce the requirements of the Act on other organisations (such as shops, pubs, banks, etc.) that provide services in the Borough. The Act specifically gives an individual the right, if they feel discriminated against, to request that the service provider makes reasonable adjustments to allow them to use the service. If the service provider does not do this they must be able to show that their failure to do this is justified. If the individual is not satisfied with this they have recourse to the Equality and Human Rights Commission to request that they take up the case on their behalf.

In relation to the specific queries raised,

1. Whilst the Council does take disability issues seriously it cannot assume powers unless these are made available through legislation. In relation to the Licensing Act 2003 in particular such powers are not provided for.

2. The question suggests that the Council as a service provider has an obligation to ensure that other bodies for which it issues Licences meet Disability Discrimination Act obligations. Unfortunately the legislation does not create either such a responsibility or powers enabling the Council to do this.

3. This refers to the answer to question 2.

4. In relation to the review of the Council's Licensing Policy in 2009, the separate legislation referred to in the answer to question 'Ask the Cabinet' 38161 was the Disability Discrimination Act.

Question Reference Number: 38808

Question submitted by John Hatton on 8 June 2010.

With the funding for BSF being threatened by the new Coalition Government, how & where will the children of Atherton be educated as the planned expansion of Westleigh & Fred Longworth High Schools wouldn't occur therefore leading to a shortage of school places?

 Answer from Councillor Susan Loudon - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children's Services:

The message we have received from Partnership for Schools who report to the Department for Education is that we should continue to progress our BSF plans. Should we be informed that these plans are no longer viable then we will propose alternative solutions to Cabinet.

Question Reference Number: 39706

Question submitted by John Hatton on 6 July 2010.

With the funding for BSF now cancelled by the new Coalition Government unless at financial close stage (read 'School buildings scheme scrapped' BBC news article (external link) & Overhaul of England's school building programme (external link) (Department for Education news article), how & where will the children of Atherton be educated as the planned expansion of Westleigh & Fred Longworth High Schools wouldn't occur therefore leading to a shortage of school places?

Answer from Councillor Susan Loudon - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children's Services:

The coalition government announcement yesterday regarding Building Schools for the Future does mean that Wigan are no longer on the programme, however, this does not affect the Council's and the Adjudicator's decision to close Hesketh Fletcher High School. We know this is a worrying time for all but be assured that alternative options are now being considered that will ensure that there are appropriate school places for Atherton children.

Further to your recent correspondence please see further information on your question:

Based upon current pupil projections there are sufficient places in Bedford, Westleigh and Fred Longworth High Schools until 2016. We will be reviewing pupil places and parental preferences over the next few years to determine where additional places need to accommodated by post 2016.

Question Reference Number: 39789

Question submitted by Kenneth Smalley on 8 July 2010.

Dear Cabinet Members', I know that streamlining services is inevitable in this current climate, but before any major decisions are made would it not be advisable to have select members of the public involved in consultations to avoid any anomosity when decisions are finalised, I have just received an e-mail were this type of excerise has been used in Liverpool regarding the reduction of Day Centre Placements. I feel the more the general public is involved the less overall pressure would fall on your good selves. Regards Ken Smalley C/o Chair Learning Dissability Partnership Board

Answer from Councillor Peter Smith - Council Leader (and Chairman of the Cabinet):

Dear Mr Smalley,

Thank you for your question and the issues you have raised. As you know, public services are experiencing unprecedented financial pressures. Immediate cuts to some grants and programmes have already been announced nationally and further clarity will emerge in October regarding the future position when the government complete their comprehensive spending review.

The point you raise regarding involving the community in decisions linked to where and how reductions in resources and services fall is an excellent one. The council is committed to engaging and involving the community in decisions that affect them and we need to work increasingly with 3rd sector organisations and communities to develop effective solutions to these issues. We have already started to work with 3rd sector groups to explore how we involve them in some of these difficult decisions, and we are currently reviewing our community engagement approach. Key to that is increasing community involvement and ensuring that communities have an influence over the decisions that affect them.

We have a number of existing mechanisms that we can and do use - we have previously used our Citizen's Panel to ask for views on key priorities and potential areas for funding reductions, and we have established Township Forums.

I would be very keen to hear your thoughts on how we best involve and respond to ideas from the community in relation to the difficult financial pressures.

Question Reference Number: 40609

Question submitted by: Paul Turner on 10 August 2010.

How can residents who do not have access to a car dispose of items (small electrical appliances/paint etc) which are not permitted in household refuse bins, given that there is only one free bulky refuse collection per household per year and pedestrian access to Recycling Sites is no longer permitted?

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Regeneration:

When buying a new electrical item it is advisable to ask the retailer you are buying it from whether they can take the old item from you in their shop or they can take the item away when they deliver the new item. Many retailers do offer these 'take back' services. Alternatively many unwanted or unused electrical appliances can be donated to charities to help raise vital funds. Electrical appliances can usually be taken to local charity shops or some charities will collect certain items. If electrical appliances are still working there are many online organisations such as Freecycle or freegle which can help you find someone who may want your old equipment. As highlighted larger electrical appliances can also be collected by the bulky collection service. Presently 3 items can be collected free per year which caters for the needs of most residents. More items and collections will incur collection charges.

The best option for the disposal of paint is through several of the Household Waste Recycling Centres and often neighbours will be happy to happy to drop off small items. Depending on the amount and quality of paint available online organisations or re-use networks may also be interested in the paint.

It is unfortunately necessary to not permit pedestrian access to the recycling sites. This is due to the large number of vehicle movements that make it unsafe to do so.

Question Reference Number: 40731

Question submitted by: Bridget Patricia Wadsworth on 15 August 2010.

Can you please tell me whether there is any truth in the latest proposal by the Government,that if you have lived in a Council property for 5 years or more you have to move out to other accomodation.

Answer from Councillor Fred Walker - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Efficiency:

Councillor Fred Walker the Cabinet lead said " At this stage the government has been trying to start a debate on possibly change the rights of council tenants across the country. I have already gone on record in the local press saying I am strongly opposed to their idea. The government will need to change the law and so I have also written to our local MPs to seek their support in challenging the government's idea.

As things stand at the moment you cannot be forced out of your home simply because you have lived their for 5 years."

Question Reference Number: 41350

Question submitted by: Linda Rawlinson on 11 September 2010

There has been a lot of news in the local press recently about revitalising the entrance to Wigan namely around the two railway stations, but what is happening to the entrance to Wigan via Chapel Lane. What a sad sight greets people with the decaying frontage of the old town hall and the overgrown land. Surely it would be better to deal with this eyesore first rather than spending money on an area which in essence looks fine.

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Regeneration:

The Old Town Hall is located on a key gateway into Wigan and it is important that the Council undertakes whatever action it can to secure improvements to its visual appearance. Unfortunately the building is in private ownership and the Council has been working with the owners to secure planning permission for its future use as well as ensuring that legal processes are progressed to improve its current appearance.

An outline planning application for the redevelopment of the site for office and residential uses, including the refurbishment of the former town hall building has been submitted. Discussions are on-going regarding the provision of information to enable the application to be progressed. This information does include details of how the Old Town Hall is to be treated as well as improvements to the townscape in the vicinity of the building including Chapel Lane.

Although the Council is working with the owners to progress the planning application we are also very mindful of the poor appearance of the building and general condition of the site. Legal action has therefore been initiated legal with notices having been served requiring that improvements are carried out. We are therefore mindful of the need to encouraging redevelopment as well as ensuring that the owners recognise there responsibilities.

In looking at the interim position discussions are currently taking place regarding screen fencing to the site and some works to the building. However, the ultimate goal is to secure the redevelopment of the site with improvements to Chapel Lane.

Question reference number: 42089

Question submitted by: Nicola Riding on 5 October 2010.

As a very concerned parent of two young children I am wondering if the council have ever considered putting speed humps on the estate where I live? If not would it be considered??? I have lived on Ullswater Rd Astley for the last 7years and have noticed a considerable increase in not only traffic, but the speed in which they travel. Not only is this a cause for concern from a parental point of view but also as a pet owner, as I have now had 2 cats killed outside my own front door!! Try explaining to a child that yet another of their much loved pets has been killed by someones wreckless driving! I'm you'll agree that I have major concerns that one day (god forbid) this could be a child.

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Regeneration:

Dear Ms Riding

Local Authorities have a statutory duty to investigate road traffic accidents and to implement a programme of works designated to promote road safety. Traffic calming is specifically aimed at reducing the number of accidents involving child pedestrians and cyclists in residential areas.

In June 2006, Cabinet approved the continued use of the Traffic Calming Assessment and Prioritisation Tool, which included the Traffic Calming Policy. The introduction of traffic calming schemes also links to the Council’s Road Safety Strategy and the Greater Manchester Local Transport Plan (GMLTP).

Traffic Calming is primarily aimed at reducing both the number of, and severity of road traffic accidents, especially to vulnerable road users such as child pedestrians and cyclists. This is achieved through self enforcing speed reduction measures, for example, road humps, speed cushions, chicanes and a variety of road surface treatments. Traffic Calming is usually introduced on an area wide basis, so that the problems being treated do not transfer to adjacent roads.

Unfortunately, there are no recorded collisions on Ullswater Road, Astley, which is why this residential road has not been prioritised for road safety engineering measures in the past, and is not on any programme of works for this financial year.

In light of the recent funding cut announcements, the LTP Highways Capital Programme allocation for Local Safety Schemes was cut by 50%, and therefore we have to prioritise sites with a known and validated evidence base, to justify the progression of sites requiring engineering improvement works.

We fully appreciate, recognise and understand the concerns raised by this resident, with regards to her experience of poor driving behaviours through this residential area, as this is being experienced at an increasing rate across the borough. However, it is important to note that engineering features are not always the best solution, and their installation in residential areas can generate mixed views amongst the local community with regards to their effectiveness, and noise and vibration concerns when larger vehicles pass over them. In addition, for some determined drivers, traffic calming features do not always encourage them to drive at reduced speeds, especially when they live within the area and are more familiar with this local road network; this is likely to be the case for Ullswater Road.

However, in light of all the above, to try and get some important road safety messages to drivers in this area, we could include Ullswater Road on the next rotation of community road safety signs, including ‘Think, Road Safety’, ‘Speed Kills’, and ‘30mph for a reason’.

Question reference number: 42180

Question submitted by: David Maloney on 8 October 2010.

What are the plans for the site of the former Abraham Guest High School?

Answer from Councillor Susan Loudon - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children's Services:

The former Abraham Guest High School site will be declared surplus to requirements and sold at its market value. The proceeds of sale from the site will be used to contribute to the new Abraham Guest School project. The site will be marketed at an appropriate time in the future with consideration to the present financial climate.

Question reference number: 45005

As a resident of Leigh I am extremely interested to read about proposed plans for a Railway station in the Pennington area. The wider benefits of this proposal have been detailed as numerous, compelling and appear to have the best interest of the leigh public as well as council budgets and environmental targets. However, what I feel is lacking is transparency as to what the council objections are to this proposal in preference of a guided bus-way. I refer to the decision to refer discussion of the rail link to council cabinet, rather than taking the opportunity for wider discussion at the council meeting on 5 January. If it is felt that there are legitimate grounds that will lead the DfT to reject plans for the Rail link, then these need to be shared as soon as possible in an open discussion and not managed 'in-house'. 

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Regeneration:

The Council has not dismissed the suggestion of a Heavy Rail Link to the Leigh area as a complimentary transport opportunity. This opportunity is currently being evaluated by the GMPTE and the Council which will result in a report being submitted to Cabinet and then to a meeting of the full Council.

The Leigh Guided Busway and the Heavy Rail Link serve different catchments and have different aims and opportunities. It is important that these are properly evaluated and a cost benefit analysis undertaken of this, and other options for rail, to properly consider that most suitable transportation options for Leigh in the future. This includes ensuring that the cost appraisals are undertaken to the same Department for Transport requirements and include some factors that are currently absent in the Stobart appraisal. In addition that impact on the mainline journey times and capacity needs consideration and discussion with Network Rail.

The rail link for the Leigh area is not necessarily mutually exclusive to the Guided Busway and could be seen as complimentary. The report to Cabinet and Council will provided members with a detailed appraisal of the options and recommendations as to how a complimentary rail initiative can considered further.

Question reference number: 45091

How do you get a activation code to get in to my council?

Answer from Councillor Fred Walker- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Efficiency:

There is a link on the Council Home Page on the web site called  My Council Account.

Choose a username and password for yourself. If you wish to be able to access Council Tax, Housing Rent or Business Rates details the n you must register and wait for an activation code to be sent to them through the post.

Question reference number: 45339

Question submitted by: Alex Cain on the 31 January 2011

Many thanks to Councillor David Molyneux for his response to question 45005, regarding Leigh Train Link. As follow up reagrding his point about the Train Link and Busway being complimentary services: Even assuming that there is enough money to build both the bus-way and train link, it doesn't seem feasible that both services could run in parallel without affecting usage of the other. Wouldn't a consultation of Leigh commuters be the best way to determine which service has the highest potential for usage?

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Environment and Regeneration:

The Leigh-Salford-Manchester busway and any potential rail project in the Leigh area are different transport schemes which serve different areas and provide distinct travel provision. The busway connects Leigh town centre with Tyldesley, Salford, Manchester city centre and the University area with a high frequency priority link. It has been shown to represent high value for money and will provide significant passenger benefits in terms of journey time savings, reliability and accessibility. Any feasible rail project in the Leigh area would provide a different kind of travel option for residents and business users. For some journeys the bus option would be preferable whilst for others a rail option would be favoured, but the two schemes could very much work together to provide significantly improved public transport provision for the eastern and southern parts of the borough. At this stage therefore there is no benefit of a public consultation exercise to seek choices between the two as they are very much complimentary but different schemes. Moreover, the issue of a rail link has been raised in the LTP3 consultation exercise and will be subject to further consideration as part of the Council’s emerging Transportation Strategy.

Question reference number: 45959

Question submitted by: Philip Dooney on 21 February 2011.

What impact will the cuts have in respect to adults considerd to have severe needs, who are receiving care support at present?

Answer from Councillor Keith Cunliffe - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Healthier Communities and Older People:

The council assesses everyone's eligibility for adult social care services under Fair Access to Care Services (FACS) . This council's eligibility threshold is that the Council will meet Critical and Substantial needs , but not Moderate or Low . There are no plans at present to change the eligibility threshold for care support in Wigan .

As part of the action being taken to reduce spending , work is being taken to ensure that care support is provided in the most effective and efficient way , and this may mean the way care support is provided may change . This would take place following an individual's re-assessment / review of care package , and would also take into account personal choice where possible .

Question reference number: 46147

Question submitted by: Karren Taylor on 1 March 2011

Hi, it is Mrs Karren Taylor and John Taylor, we are just woundering if you buy your council houses back?

Answer from Councillor Fred Walker- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Efficiency:

Thank you for the question you have sent to Wigan Council’s Cabinet via the Council’s web site.

I am sorry to say that we are currently not buying back former Council houses. The public sector spending cuts make it unlikely that we can reconsider changing our policy for some time.

 Question reference number: 46920

Question submitted by: Aileen Barry on 29 March 2011.

Please could you inform me if it has been decided by the council to abolish free bus passes to children travelling to school who attend their own faith schools. I have 3 children who have to catch 2 buses each way and I am very concerned about the cost of getting my children to school. Thank you.

Answer from Councillor Susan Loudon - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children's Services:

In answer to your question reference number 46920, the answer is no, at this stage and the Cabinet will consider the results of the consultation at a future meeting.

Question reference number: 48379

Question submitted by:  Stavros Kamintzis on 22 May 2011

Please can you tell me the email address for correct department to ask for customer only parking in front of my shop.  Wwe have a takeaway on a busy row of shops on Marsh Green Road and we have complaints from customers that there is no parking due to people who work in the shops parking there all the time as well as residents.  It should be used for customers only, I was just proposing to put pay meters there or a strict parking rule.

Answer from Councillor K Anderson - Cabinet Portfolio for Environment and Communities

Dear Mr Kamintzis,

Thank you for your recent enquiry regarding the parking outside your premises on Marsh Green Pemberton. The Area Traffic Engineer has undertaken a site visit to assess the parking in the area and to ascertain whether there is any justification for the introduction of limited waiting in the lay-bys outside your premises. I am pleased to inform you that we will be recommending the introduction of a 30 minute limited waiting order with no return for 1 hour operational between the hours of 8.00am to 6.00pm Monday to Friday. This will improve the availability of parking for customers to all the retail premises in this section. A report will be submitted to the Traffic Management Unit meeting on the 20 July to consider this.

Government legislation does not allow customer only parking to be introduced on the public highway because it is not practical to enforce by the Civil Enforcement Officers (formerly known as Traffic Wardens) in terms of proving whether the parking is by customers or not. If the limited waiting parking is introduced this will enable customers to park for a short period while they visit the shops and it will prevent the workers from the shops parking up all day.

I trust this information is of benefit.

 Question reference number: 48422

Question submitted by: Lindsay on 24 May 2011

Please could you let us know what urgent measures are being taken to increase reception class places for children in Lowton starting this September? With so many four year olds in Lowton not receiving a place in any of our local primary schools, this is going to be a long term problem for this year group throughout their education. Also, have additional places been created at these schools in previous oversubscribed years? Thank you.

Answer from Councillor Susan Loudon - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children's Services:

Dear Lindsay,

Thank you for your request for information.

When notification letters are sent out about the allocation of reception class places it is usually the case that some parents give back word on places. This is can be due to house moves, parents changing their preferences of school, etc. The local authority then has a duty to co-ordinate this information and ensure any places that become available are allocated to children on waiting lists at the relevant schools.

Since reception places were allocated on 26 April, there has been some release of places in the Lowton and Golborne area and these are being allocated to those on waiting lists. The impact of such changes is being closely monitored.

Parents who have been refused places at their preferred schools have been advised of their right of appeal to an independent appeal panel and appeal hearings will start to take place in June.

In the past no additional places have been created at oversubscribed schools as there has usually been enough places available across the Lowton and Golborne area. A meeting, has been requested by elected members, which is due to take place as soon as the appeals process is complete. At this meeting, Councillors, Senior Officers, and myself, (Cabinet Member for Children and Young People’s Services) will review the situation.

Question reference number: 48800

Question submitted by Phil Patterson on 8 June 2011

There have been a number of good projects and proposals put forward by the council over the last few years, such as the A49 Link Proposal at Westwood/Poolstock and the Chinagateway Project. Or the Bickershaw North and South developments. However, after the initial fanfare it is very hard to find out how these proposals are progressing. With cut backs in council funding coming into affect over the next few years, more such projects may be cancelled, delayed or modified. Is the council working to make the progress of such projects more transparent and what is the current status of the examples above?

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Regeneration:

Dear Mr Patterson,

"Thank you for your enquiry regarding the progress of some of the Council's schemes. You are quite right to point out that cuts in public sector funding have had a delaying impact on the progress of some of these schemes. However, the Council is still very much committed to the delivery of these although alternative options and funding mechanisms are having to be explored. Nevertheless I am quite optimistic that we will make progress with most of our priority schemes and it may be helpful if I provide a brief position statement on some of those that you raise together with the progress on others that are also important to the future of the Borough.

With regard to Bickershaw South the reclamation of this site is still subject to funding from the Homes and Communities Agency (HCA). I am sure that you will have seen that the site has now been reclaimed with new access roads, canal marina and landscaping. The completion of the first phase of that work was formally completed last week. A procurement exercise to provide a house building partner is underway to provide around 650 new homes on the site.

Bickershaw North is a casualty of public sector funding cuts as the HCA are no longer in a position to fund the reclamation of this site. However, the Council is currently re-evaluating other options to restore the site to compliment the work on Bickershaw South and I am optimistic that we will be able to secure a reclamation of the site in the near future.

The A49 and Westwood development have been a victim of the slump in the development market. However, the Council has recently engaged Consultants to look at costings and options for a the delivery of development on the site which includes the construction of the road and I expect the outcome of this work to be considered by the Council's Cabinet in early Autumn.

More recently work is underway on a major streetscape improvement on Wallgate in Wigan Town Centre as part of the Saddle Junction improvement on which the construction of major highway work will commence in January including the reclamation of the current First Bus site as a new development opportunity.

In addition to the above the Council is actively working with the development industry to bring forward some much needed regeneration projects for the borough and look at innovative solutions to some of our sites where the market has been a factor in slowing down development delivery. We do actively provide press releases on the work that we are doing, including updates in Borough Life, but I am sure that you will appreciate that there are some schemes where the Council now needs to properly consider alternative delivery models before we disclose these formally and attach any indicative timescales to their delivery.

I hope that the above provides a progress update on the sites that you raise and demonstrates that we remain committed to the deliver of these projects by looking at alternative mechanism in what is an unprecedented difficult market."

Question reference number: 48814

Question submitted by: Mr Towler on 9 June 2011

Ref question 46920 regarding the decision on free school bus travel for children that attend their faith schools in the borough. Can you please inform us if a decision has been made yet as many parents will need to make alternative arrangements for the school run in September. I understand the council is attempting to reduce the number of cars on the roads at certain times of the day, but removing free school bus travel will only have the opposite effect as parents resort to driving children to school and back again at 2 of the busiest times of the day.

Answer from Councillor Susan Loudon - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children's Services:

Dear Mr Towler

Home to School Transport

Thank you for your enquiry about the outcome of the consultation.

In overall terms there were a significant number of responses received.

A full analysis of the responses to the Home to School Transport consultation will be presented to the Council Cabinet meeting in June 2011.

Meanwhile a statement is available on the Council’s website at http://www.wigan.gov.uk/services/councildemocracy/consultation//transportconsultation

If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely

Councillor Susan Loudon

Cabinet Member for Children and Young People

Question reference number: 48929

Question submitted by: Brendan Dewar  on 14 June 2011

What assessment has been carried out on the potential impact of the closure of Hindley pool on the health and financial wellbeing of vulnerable adults, the elderly and children who currently use Hindley pool?

Answer from Councillor Chris Ready- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Communication and Customer:

At this stage Cabinet has decided only to seek expressions of interest from community organisations that may wish to run the pool and for public consultation to be carried out. Work is being undertaken in respect of the assessment of impact on the users of the facility, which will be informed by the consultation feedback. This will be taken into account as part of the next stage when Cabinet takes the decision about the future of the pool.

Question reference number: 48999

Question submitted by: Jenifer on 16 June 2011

With regards to Ref question 46920 I too am now increasingly concerned about what is going to happen in September when my daughter starts high school. There doesn't seem to be anywhere to go for answers abt the free bus pass/bus fare entitlement. September might be a few months off but for me with other children to take to other parts of the borough to get to their preschool sessions, it would make all the difference to have a transport plan in place.

Answer from Councillor Susan Loudon - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children and Young People's Services:

Free travel passes are currently issued using the following criteria:

• School bus passes will issued if the walking distance between home and school for a pupil attending the nearest suitable primary school is more than two miles, measured by a reasonable walking route decided by the Integrated Transport Unit.
• School bus passes will be issued if the walking distance between home and school for a pupil attending the nearest suitable secondary school is more than three miles, measured by a reasonable walking route decided by the Integrated Transport Unit.
• School bus passes will be issued if the walking distance between home and school for a pupil attending one of their three nearest suitable schools, if the school they attend is more than two miles and less than six miles, measured by a reasonable walking route decided by the Integrated Transport Unit, and you are in receipt of full Working Tax Credit or your child is eligible for free school meals.
• School bus passes will be issued to pupils attending the nearest available secondary school preferred by reason of a parent’s religion or belief, if the walking distance between home and school is more than three miles and less than 15 miles, measured by a reasonable walking route decided by the Integrated Transport Unit.
• School bus passes will be issued to pupils attending a secondary school who attend the nearest available school preferred by reason of a parent’s religion if the school is more than two miles and less than 15 miles, measured by a reasonable walking route decided by the ITU and you are in receipt of full Working Tax Credit or your child is eligible for free school meals

Following the Cabinet decison on 9th June, it was decided that bus passes would no longer be issued to children attending faith schools, from September 2012, unless they attend the nearest available school preferred by reason of a parent's religion if the school is more than two miles and less than fifteen miles and parents or guardians are in receipt of the full amount of Working Tax Credit or the child is eligible for free school meals

 Question reference number: 49516

Question submitted by: James Oldham on 4 July 2011. 

Why are you making such a flawed sell off, of the Mesnes Field. It makes neither social, nor commercial sense, but does allow the developers to grasp a prime piece of land for a pittance. You are not acting in the best short, or long term interests of the town.

Answer from Councillor Ged Bretherton - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Efficiency:

The case for releasing part of Mesnes Field to allow developers to build a state of the art Youth Zone was approved by Cabinet because financially the proposition presented good value for the people of Wigan and the social impact of this building is expected to be significant for the Young People of Wigan.

For a piece of land with a value of around £30,000 we will be able to build a £6 million Youth Centre. In the current climate of cuts within the public sector this represents the Council's best option for investing in the young people of Wigan. In addition the costs of running the centre ourselves would cost more than we are paying to the charity On Side to run this.

We feel that the social impact will help reduce anti social behaviour, improve the range of services available for children and young people, and give a safe environment for children and young people to meet.

Question reference number: 49771

Question submitted by: Kenneth Smalley on 8 July 2011

Dear Cabinet Members, I have been asked to contact you with this question from the North West Development Team and Pathways associates I watched the Panorama programme on the 31st May 2011 on BBC 1. I am really worried about the support we may be buying or providing in our area for people with a learning disability. I would like you to tell me Can you honestly say that the support services you are responsible for buying would be ideal for you or a member of your family? If the answer is no, what are you doing about it? If there are actions you take to check these services I would like to know what they are. I look forward to your response, please let me know if we need to ask anybody else the same question Please return you response back to me at. k.smalley@blueyonder.co.uk Yours Ken Smalley C/o Chair Learning Disability Partnership Board.

Answer from Councillor Susan Loudon - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children and Young People's Services:

Support for people with learning disabilities in Wigan is provided by a range of services, directly delivered by the Council, or through external agencies. Most of those agencies are voluntary sector charities or not for profit organisations with a keen interest in the wellbeing of people with learning disabilities. Placements for service users are organised on an individual basis with social workers providing the assessment and support to service users, their family or carers through the process.

Service providers are currently approved by the Council prior to any placement under a block contract or through our purchasing framework. In exceptional circumstances, where a service user’s needs cannot be met through these mechanisms, the social worker will work with the service user to identify the best option available, taking full account of the need to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the service user.

The council works with the national body, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to ensure quality of care provision in Wigan. In addition a local Quality Standards Framework (QSF) has been developed to scrutinise the quality of service provision. This is a wide ranging approach that has a focus that includes the safeguarding, support planning and health and safety measures in place to protect service users and promote their overall health and wellbeing. The way the Council implements the QSF includes taking views of service users, family and carers as well as examining the policies, procedures and practices of the service provider. To enhance this approach the Council consults with a wide range of stakeholders on the approach to services for vulnerable people and has an “open door” for those who have an interest in the wellbeing of vulnerable people to speak to us about their concerns. This is linked to a vigorous examination of any complaints.

Overall, there is an appropriately robust approach in place to ensure the health and wellbeing of service users in Wigan across a range of client groups including people with learning disabilities. This is designed to eliminate as far as possible the likelihood of neglect or abuse occurring in Wigan and to ensure early detection if such a thing were to take place.

Question reference number: 50103

Question submitted by: Nicola Gaskell on 14 July 2011.

As a user of Hindley Pool could the Cabinet please explain why the consultation period in respect of the pool's closure is limited to 28 days. Are the Council merely paying lip service to the consultation process? Further can the Cabinet please justify to my 11 and 8 year old children why Hindley Pool faces closure when the Council owns art work to the value of £1.9m which could be sold and the monies invested to provide an income to make up the Council's shortfall? My 11 year old wishes to be present at the meeting when the decision re Hindley Pool will be taken. PLease provide confirmation that the meeting will be held in public and provide the date and time. Finally with reference to the public meeting relating to the possible pool closure:- a) Why was no member of the Council made available on the panel; and b) The panel from WLCT seemed to admit that the figures provided to Council re Hinldey pool usage was inacurate. Please confirm that the report will be revisited so that any decision is based upon true facts to avoid the need for a costly judicial review.

Answer from Councillor Chris Ready- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Communication and Customer:

The Cabinet can appreciate your concern with the proposal that the Council ceases to subsidise Hindley pool as it is obviously going to effect you and your family. The Council is facing many difficult decisions as a result of having to reduce our budget by 25% over the next three years and the proposal for Hindley is only being considered given the scale of savings that will have to be made.

Cabinet considered that a 28 day consultation period was sufficient to capture the views of pool users and non users that would help to inform any decision on the future of Hindley pool. The end of the consultation period will not be treated as a guillotine, although questionnaires are no longer being made available any views submitted up until the point of writing the Cabinet report will be taken into account. The consultation process is not merely being paid lip service, but is an important part of the process.

At the moment no decision has been made to close Hindley pool and we are trying to look at other options for operating the pools including transferring the management to a community organisation. We have had a very good response to the consultation especially for Hindley pool and we will consider the results of the consultation alongside other key information when making a decision.

Cabinet meetings are open to the public, who can attend and listen to the debate. However, on occasion reports contain detailed information that is not appropriate to be discussed in the public domain (eg commercially sensitive information) and the Cabinet will go into a closed session when considering reports of that nature. The agenda for Cabinet meetings is published 5 working days in advance and indicates whether reports are press excluded or not. At present the date for the report on the swimming pools has not been decided as work is still ongoing in respect of analysing the consultation responses and considering all the options.

Wigan and Leisure Culture Trust (WLCT) conducted the recent public meeting you refer to and they have been managing the consultation process on behalf of the Council. Given the aim of the consultation meeting to collect the views of the community on the proposal it was considered appropriate that no member of the Council was made available on the panel or attended the event.

The report you refer to is a first stage report and will not be revisited, However the Council is working with WLCT to address the questions that are being raised by the community and we will ensure any future report is robust and contains a proper evidence base on which to make a sound decision.

Question reference number: 50353

Question submitted by: Brendan Dewar on 22 July 2011

In the report submitted to cabinet on 9th June 2011 Hindley Pool was indentified as having the second lowest pool usage in the borough. In the news release of 13 June 2011 it was said "A meeting of the council's ruling Cabinet on Thursday (June 9) heard that the two pools (Hindley & Tyldsley) attract less visitors than others in the borough" It has now emerged that in both 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 Hindley Pool had the highest number of visitors of any pool in the borough, 20,000 more than the next busiest and nearly as many as both Leigh and Tyldsley combined. Could you please explain: - Why the report and news release contained these statements Why, once it had been realised that the both the report and the news release contained inaccuracies, no admission of this has been made on the Wigan Council news site to ensure that respondents to the consultation had correct information.

Answer from Councillor Chris Ready- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Communication and Customer:

The report did give details of usage for 4 years, with an explanation as to why it is difficult to compare figures. In many cases facts need to be supported by explanations (eg the impact of free swimming or the closure of facilities) and therefore can not just be taken at face value without other considerations. In addition the report clearly pointed out that the Hindley swimming figure given was low as it refers to swimming only, but other centres include swimming and dry facilities. The report gives a reflection of usage over a period of time and not just one year and takes into account the implications of other factors that influence swimming numbers at each location. At the Cabinet meeting members specifically asked for more detailed information about the numbers of swims at each pool, which was not available at that time.

The press releases issued tried to get across the key messages without misrepresenting the facts.Concerns raised in the consultation exercise about the detail in the Cabinet report of the 9th June will be referred to in the report to Cabinet for the final decision. However, it is not felt that the content of the report of the 9th June has had a significantly detrimental impact on the consultation exercise, or that there was a need to release a further press release. The purpose of the consultation exercise was to allow full consideration of the views of the users of Hindley pool about the potential withdrawal of the council subsidy for its management.

It is important to also remember that the report states that the principles of the review must cover more than just no. of visitors. We must be looking to ensure we are providing sufficient swimming pool provision to meet the needs and demands of the general public, the schools swimming programme, the swimming clubs and the swim scheme of excellence, whilst taking into account: the condition of the pools and the buildings, the current level of usage of the pools and revenue costs, and the geographical location of the pools and the proximity of other public swimming pools.

Question reference number: 50389

Question submitted by: Lauren Gaskell on 23 July 2011

I am 11 and swim at Hindley Pool, my brother is 8. I went to the public meeting and asked a question. I felt the panel talked down to me when they replied. I am not stupid. I would therefore like to ask the same question to the Cabinet - what would the Councils response be if I and my friends persuaded those 12,000 people who signed the petition refused to use the leisure facilities operated by Wigan MBC? Don't my Mum and Dad pay tax to the Council to provide facilities for me and my brother to use? Please could the Cabinet let me know what facilities there are in Hindley that I and my friends can access on foot (we can go swimming by ourselves on foot). I don't want to have nothing to do and be forced to walk the streets in a gang but there will be nothing to do if the pool closes. Where am I meant to go and what am I meant to do? Thankyou, Lauren.

Answer from Councillor Chris Ready- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Communication and Customer:

Thanks you for the question, which raises an important issue. The Council does not want to have to shut down any facilities that the public value, but it is being forced to take some difficult decision because we simply do not have the same amount of money to run all our services due to cuts made by central government. We are exploring every possible option to keep the pool open by seeking interest from outside groups and organisations about taking over the running and the management of the pool. This is the same approach as we took for the Monaco in Hindley, which has remained open but under different management.

Question reference number: 50376

Question submitted by: Steven Parry on 25 July 2011

Can you please give me a time scale on when we will know something about the exiting new proposal for the much needed rail link for leigh, thanks.

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Regeneration and Deputy Leader of the Council:

The Council is working in partnership with Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) and Network Rail to commission a consultancy study to evaluate the opportunity for a rail connection to the Leigh area. The brief for the study has been shared with the Transport for Leigh Group and the contract is to be imminently let with the findings reported in Autumn. Further actions thereafter will depend on the content of the report. The report will examine the technical feasibility of a rail link and provide some information on any potential route alignment and indicative costs. In order to ensure that the community have an input into this work, Mr Ged Tyrell of the Transport for Leigh Group has agreed to be a member of the Study Steering Group.

Question reference number: 50678

Question submitted by: Jacqui Grimshaw on 2 August 2011.

I have followed recent local press regarding a lack of school places within the Lowton area. I am very concerned about what measures are being put into place for next year as this is obviously going to be a reoccurring problem? On speaking to local residents about this I was devastated to learn that there were placed in a school more than 2 miles away. Although this is technically classed as within the Wigan borough as a parent with 3 young children I do not feel that this is suitable when there are 3 schools within a 5 minute walking distance from my house.

Answer from Councillor Susan Loudon - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children and Young People's Services:

Thank you for your enquiry,

For reception intake 2011 we received more applications for places in Lowton schools than was expected and initially some Lowton children were offered a school place out of the area. Following a review additional places were made available at Lowton J & I and as a result Lowton children could be offered a place at a school nearer to their home.

We do not expect high levels of oversubscription for school places in the Lowton area for the 2012 reception intake. However, given the slight rise in applications we received for places this September we are closely monitoring existing and projected pupil numbers. If necessary, long term permanent solutions will be considered. ‪‬‪

When applying for a school place it advisable for parents, or guardians, to read thoroughly the information given in the booklet for parents, 'Admissions to Primary Schools' or 'Admissions to Secondary Schools' before stating their preferences on their application. The school admission booklets that relate to admissions in 2012 will be available from mid September and can be accessed via the Council's website at http://www.wigan.gov.uk/Services/EducationLearning/Schools/Admissions/

Question reference number: 50767

Question submitted by: Lauren Gaskell on 3 August 2011

RE Question 50389 Dear Mr Ready, Thank you for your reply. But you haven't answered my question. What facilities will there be in Hindley if the Pool closes that I and my 8 year old brother can use? If you have no money why does the front page of the Wigan Observer say that you will spend £400,000 on a new Boys and Girls Club in Wigan that me and my brother and our friends won't be able to get to on foot. It doesn't seem fair or are you using the money you would have spent keeping Hindley Pool open on this new Club. Please can you explain it to me if you want to I am on holiday from school and if my Mum will give me a lift I could come and see you at the Town Hall so you can explain it to me. My brother could come as well.

Answer from Councillor Chris Ready- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Communication and Customer:

Lauren, you have quite rightly pointed out that Hindley pool is one of a range of facilities in Hindley. Clearly there are a number of different facilities in the area that serve residents of all ages, and as you live in the community you will be well aware of what is available.

I can assure you that the council is examining every possible opportunity to allow us to keep the pool open and that includes looking at how the community can manage and run the pool itself.

The council runs and manages a wide range of facilities and services for all residents, not just in Hindley but across the whole borough. So, in the same way as Hindley pool is seen by local residents as an important facility the Wigan Boys and Girls Club will become a site that will be used by many children from all across the borough. You are, however, quite right to point out that there are travel issues associated with the Boys and Girls Club and the developer is looking into ways to ensure the community outside Wigan town centre can gain access by public transport. Accessibility is always an important but sometimes difficult consideration in deciding where it is best to locate such a facility. Clearly the town centre is a hub for the train and bus stations and is therefore a good reason why it is the best location.

Your suggestion to meet with me has been noted but as we are in the process of considering the expressions of interest received for the 2 pools and are continuing our discussions with Wigan Leisure and Culture Trust about the future of Hindley pool it is not therefore appropriate, at this stage, to meet with you. However, we hope the above information is helpful.

Question reference number: 52277

A friend of mine has a G. Espin long case wall clock made by a Wigan clock maker from around 1880 till 1930's he need to sell, would the council be interested in it before it goes abroad or out of the area please.

Answer from Councillor Chris Ready- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Communication and Customer:

The Council does not currently have a budget for museums acquisitions. If your friend had an interest in donating the clock to the Museum, Wigan Leisure and Culture Trust's Collections Team would be interested in talking to him, and they can be contacted at the Museum of Wigan Life on 01942 828128 or by email at heritage@wlct.org . It should be noted that a range of factors are taken into account when considering museums acquisitions, whether by purchase or through considering the acceptance of donations.

Question reference number: 53369

Question submitted by: Darren Smith on 15 September 2011.

Does the council feel that 'building stronger communties ' portfolio is working, what are it's weak points How can organised local residents groups work together with the Council to help turn this agenda into something more than a pretty headline?

Answer from Councillor K Anderson - Cabinet Portfolio for Environment and Communities

The Building Stronger Communities Partnership portfolio is working and continues to deliver sustained reductions in a wide range of crime and disorder issues through a mix of prevention, diversion and enforcement activity; this also includes significant work directly with local residents in a variety of ways (in many cases generated by them). This includes communities and individual citizens taking part in consultation and engagement programmes that help shape what services are required and how existing services can become more effective (a good current example is the wide ranging consultation we’re embarking on around Wigan’s Transport Strategy). But it also includes active groups of local residents working within their own communities (and by communities we mean both geographic and issue based communities) on issues that directly affect them, often alongside partner agencies. As with all areas of our activity we are working to ensure that we continuously improve; and in this area we are currently reviewing and evaluating parts of the portfolio to ensure that it continues to deliver and has a positive impact.

As you will no doubt be aware, the public sector is dealing with significant challenges due to the levels of budget cuts that we are managing – this is impacting across all partners involved in delivering the Building Stronger Communities portfolio, both public and 3rd Sector. We also know that community groups are affected – with reducing opportunities to raise funds and secure grants. In addition to this, the capacity of communities to be actively involved in delivering solutions to local issues varies across different parts of the Borough. All of these areas remain challenging, but we are fully committed to this agenda and recognise that we all need to think collaboratively about how we prioritise and continue to deliver outcomes within this area of work creatively and differently - within the financial constraints that we face.

Local residents groups working together with the council and its partners do already turn this agenda into something more than a pretty headline. For example:

• The council receive Pathfinder Play Funding in the region of £2m thanks to the partnership working that had been ongoing with local community groups and Wigan Leisure and Culture Trust. This has enabled significant improvements to be made to play facilities across the Borough.
• Play provision across the Borough has also seen significant improvements through individual community groups working with the council, Wigan Leisure and Culture Trust and Groundwork on schemes for their local play facility. This could be using Section 106 Play Funding as pump priming funding, helping the group secure additional or total grant funding for the scheme, giving advice, guidance and other support. 
• Communities have worked with the council and other partners to green alleys, clean up grot spots, plant trees and 1000’s of bulbs across the Borough to make it cleaner and greener. 
• Some residents groups have worked with us and our partners in providing positive diversionary activities for young people. This could be through providing a venue for the activity, providing adults to help run the activity, securing funding for or completely providing and managing the activity. 
• Some communities are working with us and our partners on developing a 10 year plan to change things in their community, using funding only accessible to the community.

There are many more examples of organised groups working with the Council and our partners in this area.

Increasingly, given the current financial environment that we are in, additional funding to carryout improvements is more likely to come via our community groups than ourselves and our partners. Our ability to resource advice, guidance and other support is also going to be tested. We are however convinced that by continuing to work with local resident groups the Building Stronger Communities Portfolio will continue to develop and deliver positive outcomes for the residents of the Borough. It’s therefore vital that local residents groups continue to have and develop good relationships with their Ward Councillors and Council. The development of ‘one stop shops’ in the new Life Centres across the Borough and the new Joint Service Centre are examples of ways we are trying to make it easier for residents to communicate and develop a relationship with us.

Thank you for taking the time to raise such an important issue. I look forward to continuing and strengthening our joint approach to building stronger communities in our borough.

Question reference number: 53420

Question submitted by Mr Andy Swift on 17 September 2011

Hindley Library and its services are being relocated to the Day Centre in First Avenue. What is planned for the old library building in Market Street? I assume the old building will remain the responsibility of Wigan Council. Will the structure still be maintained and put to another use or will it end up like the old Wigan Town Hall derelict and an eye sore for years to come. I am a committee member of Hindley Residents Association and have put this question to my local Councillors who do not have any answers. Thanks Andy Swift

Answer from Councillor Chris Ready- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Communication and Customer:

The current library building in Hindley is owned by the council and we will be responsible for determining its future once the library has vacated it. However, the matter is not straight forward as the Hindley Historical Society also occupy the first floor of the building as a museum. Therefore any decision about the future of the library building will have to take this user into account too.

The decision made by Cabinet on the 18th August 2011, when the library review proposals were considered, was that the Officers consider further the options available for the future use of the current Hindley library building, following discussions with the Hindley Historical Society.

Officers are currently in discussions with the Society and this will inform any future proposal about the future of the building. The building is Grade II listed and lies within the Hindley Town Centre Conservation Area so there will be planning controls that would potentially affect the options for future uses of the building. In addition the issue about the potential for a vacant building to fall into disrepair also relevant and will be taken into account in any future decision.

Question reference number: 53475

Question submitted by: F Smith on 19 September 2011

I wrote to borough life with regard to the possibility of opening the hundreds of derelict mine shafts in the area and dumping household refuse down them. If this is feasable, it would save thousands of pounds in landfill. As usual i did not get a reply and I am concerned that questions are being ignored. All I want is to know whether it is posible or not. Is this too much to ask.

Answer from Councillor K Anderson - Cabinet Portfolio for Environment and Communities

The use of former mine shafts for the deposit of waste does pose a number a number of major environmental problems which would inhibit this suggestion.

Many shafts, particularly associated with more recent colliery closures were either filled or partially filled and therefore there is no space within the shaft for waste. The opening of shafts that were not filled poses other issues. Firstly, it is likely there would have been a change in the water table as a consequence of the closure of mines where pumping of underground water occurred to lower the water table. The likelihood is that many shafts would now be partially filled with water. Secondly, there would likely have been a major deterioration in the shaft walls or lining since closure and if the concrete cap which is usually placed over such shafts was removed then there is a risk of ground stability and structural problems.

Whilst the above demonstrates potential problems with the shafts themselves, in addition to potential methane gas emissions that could result, there would be a major environmental issue with the deposit of waste itself. Waste can cause serious water pollution problems. As mentioned above most shafts pass through the underground water table and therefore waste can contaminate this and cause a major pollution incident. In some cases water is extracted from underground water sources for agricultural irrigation and domestic use.

In addition to mine gas the decomposition of some forms of waste does release methane gas which would require costly management arrangements. For these reasons it is highly unlikely that the Environment Agency would issue a licence for the deposit of waste in a shaft due to the major environmental risks involved, stability issues and the cost implications.

Whilst landfill still occurs it is increasingly being phased out as more emphasis is placed on recycling and other forms of waste management. Therefore given the risks and costs involved in placing waste in a shaft there would be no beneficial cost saving in exploring this option and even if there were it is likely that one of the major waste management companies would have investigated this in more detail. However, to the best of the Council's knowledge there have been no known cases where the deposit of waste in a former shaft has been examined in recent times.

Question reference number: 53520

Question submitted by: Roy Turner on 20 September 2011.

What is the number of council employees and their cost in salary and wages compared with last year? Full time employees only.

Answer from Councillor Ged Bretherton - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Efficiency:

For the period 1/4/09 - 31/3/10 there were 3086 full time staff. The total basic pay for these staff came to £76,129,643.95.

With the addition of on costs etc the total salaries for these staff came to £77,237,968.88

For the period 1/4/10 - 31/3/11 there were 2756 full time staff. The total basic pay for these staff came to £68,828,600.16.

With the addition of on costs etc the total salaries for these staff came to £70,400,789.93

Question reference number: 53541

Question submitted by: Anne Swift on 21 September 2011.

Hindley Library is being relocated to the Day Centre in First Avenue. What is happening to all the resources of the current Day Centre? Will it be a shared facility or will the current service users be relocated to another venue. Either way the service users will be disrupted and allot of unnecessary anxiety will be inflicted on them.

Answer from Councillor Chris Ready- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Communication and Customer:

As part of the review of Library Services Hindley Library is to be located in Hindley Day Centre from January 2012. Unfortunately this does mean that Day Care Services for older people will no longer be delivered from Hindley Day.

However, we do wish to reassure that community that these services are not being withdrawn but will be delivered from other service points. Consultation is already occurring with users of the Centre, and where requested their carer, to discuss the most appropriate alternative centre.

We do understand the good relationships that have been established between the community who use the Centre and staff and the Council will be doing its utmost to ensure that these relationships and the friendships made are retained. Members of staff will be relocating alongside the users of the Centre."

Question reference number: 53514

Question submitted by: K Hart on 20 September 2011

Question for Mr David Molyneux.would like to ask if orwhen the land at the bottom of Ince Green Lane,is going to be landscaped or at least be cleaned up.At present it isnt a very good advert for our comparitively new medical centre. Yours sincerely K Hart

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Regeneration and Deputy Leader of the Council:

Whilst there is landscaping around the immediate vicinity of the new building it is accepted that the approaches to the Health Centre are in need of improvement. In particular the bunds placed alongside the access road to deter travellers from siting their caravans on the adjacent land do require considerable improvement by regrading and seeding.

Officers have been instructed to implement some environmental improvement works over the next few weeks to improve the appearance of these bunds and the surrounding land to ensure that the access road is of an acceptable appearance to compliment the new Health Centre.

Question reference number: 53824

Question submitted by: Mrs Baker on 28 September 2011

Concerning the repairs on the bridge on Bolton Rd in Atherton, on Monday morning I walked over the walkway at 9.55am not one workman was working, I do think that this is a bit late for starting work on such a big job, the diversions are causing a lot of disruption not only for people getting to work but everyone adding to the exspense of using extra petrol and time getting from A to B, I appreciate that the bridge needs to be repaired, but lets have a full days work,how is it that nothing is being done at weekend? I'm sure there is a lot of other people have the same concerns.

Answer from Councillor K Anderson - Cabinet Portfolio for Environment and Communities

Further to the enquiry from Mrs B kaker, I can confirm that these works are the responsibility of Network Rail and not the Council. That said, I can advise that at this early stage of the works the new bridge supports are being constructed and the existing supports are being strengthened and modified to accommodate the proposed new bridge structure. A lot of work is being carried out at night when there are no train services. Furthermore, because a significant amount of work is taking place below the existing bridge which is not visible to members of the public, we do understand how there could be a misconception that work is not taking place.

The old bridge structure is planned to be removed over the weekend of 22 October and the new bridge structure will be lowered into place a week later.

Question reference number: 53828

Question submitted by: Steve Kane on 29 September 2011

To Councillor Kevin Anderson Please will you advise when I will be getting my blue bin ,and also when will we be getting the new bin collection dates as the ones printed in the Borough Life are useless and cannot be understood by the majority of the people. 

Answer from Councillor K Anderson - Cabinet Portfolio for Environment and Communities:

Dear Mr Kane,

I have checked with the distribution team and Humber Road, Astley is scheduled to receive blue bins in March 2012. An information leaflet and calendar will be delivered approximately one month before the blue bins are delivered. I realise your current calendar will end in November and we will be sending out an interim calendar in the next few weeks to cover this period.

Question reference number: 54189

Question submitted on 12 October 2011

What can be done about cars parking on pavements, on our estate cars are parking half on the road and half on the kerb, making it difficult for young children to ride there bikes and mums to push prams. We have flats on the estate with a rear car park and many do not use the car park making it more difficult for visitors to park.

Answer from Councillor K Anderson - Cabinet Portfolio for Environment and Communities:

Footpath parking can be inconvenient for pedestrians and especially hazardous for disabled and elderly people, and those who are visually impaired and people with push chairs.‬‪‪

There is currently no national legislation banning the parking of all vehicles on the pavement, due to the wide range of circumstances and locations where pavement parking occurs. Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGV's) are banned from parking on the pavement, although a HGV may be parked on the pavement when loading/unloading is taking place.

Nationwide, the police are able to take action when a vehicle parked on the pavement is deemed to be causing an obstruction or is parked dangerously. ‬‪ Local authorities have the power to make Traffic Regulation Orders, allowing for specific parking regulations to be implemented in specific areas, according to the demands of local circumstances. Local authorities can for example introduce a Traffic Regulation Order in a single road banning the parking of vehicles on any part of the pavement.

The Traffic Group are currently looking at a number of options to resolve footpath parking around the borough including the introduction of Traffic Regulation Orders to prohibit vehicles from the foot way.　 However, once the proposals are developed they will be presented to the Council's Cabinet for their consideration.‬‪

Question reference number: 55433

Question submitted on 30 November 2011 by Mr D Marsh

Dear Cabinet Members, do you consider the health and wellbeing of people living in Wigan to be more important than those living in Leigh? I am asking this because I have just heard that the Leigh Sports Village gym and pool etc is closed on 30.11.2011 yet the facility in Wigan will be open with staff who work at the Leigh facility being asked to go to Wigan and cover for people on strike so they can stay open. If this has happened I find it shocking and total non parity of treatment. Why not do it the other way around? Do you plan on refunding people who pay to use the facilities at the Sports Village for the day that you have closed this service? Can you advise what if any contingencies you intend to put in place to avoid this laughable situation in the future?

Answer from Councillor Chris Ready- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Communication and Customer:

The council's sports facilities are managed by Wigan Leisure and Culture Trust (WLCT) on our behalf. On Tuesday 29th November we suffered some damage to the roof at Leigh due to the weather. Roofing materials fell from the roof on to the surrounding footpaths and car park. Clearly this was a danger to passers by. Therefore WLCT closed the sports hall and barriers were erected around the building and those car parks which were in the proximity of the roof damage. Unfortunately, contractors would not go up on to the roof during the high winds but the repairs were completed on the Wednesday 30th November.

Once the repair on the roof had been completed and made safe, the barriers were removed from around the surrounding areas and the car parks. However, as it was not known how long the roof repairs would take until the contractor got on to the roof a decision was taken on Tuesday to transfer those staff that work at Leigh to the Wigan Life centre. The decision was not therefore taken to prioritise services at Wigan over Leigh, but due to the fact that Leigh could not open for health and safety reasons.

WLCT put signs on the front doors at Leigh ISC stating that the building was closed due to repairing damage on the roof.

Question reference number:  55492

Question submitted on 1 December 2011 by Mr K Gee

It was initially confirmed by the traffic section, after a site assessment, that there would be a report submitted to the October TMU recommending the introduction of a prohibition of waiting order at both sides of the junction of Bank Avenue and St James Road Orrell; this followed a safety concern being raised by myself on behalf of the residents of Bank Avenue. I understand that this proposal has now been shelved, despite being initially deemed necessary? The measures were required to improve visibility and traffic/pedestrian safety, and to assist traffic movements near to the junction, where parked cars obstruct sightlines and turning movements, particularly for emerging traffic. Can you please give further consideration to the matter before there is a serious accident at the junction due to the extremely poor visibility, particularly during the school runs when there is increased pedestrian and vehicular traffic?

Answer from Councillor K Anderson - Cabinet Portfolio for Environment and Communities:

Dear Mr Gee,

Banks Avenue/St James Road, Orrell

I refer to your enquiry dated 1 December, regarding the introduction of waiting restrictions at the junction of Banks Avenue and St James Road, Orrell.

As you correctly state a report was originally proposed to be presented to the Traffic Management Unit on the 18th October 2011 to consider the introduction of restrictions at this location. This proposal was withdrawn from the agenda at the request of the local councillor who originally raised the issue on your behalf following concerns raised by other local residents in the area.

We will arrange for this item to be discussed at the next Traffic Management Unit meeting on the 31 January 2012 and we will contact you with the decision.

I trust this course of action meets with your approval.

Question reference number: 56257

Question submitted on 30 December 2011 by Mr J Rotherham

What if anything is being done to review the Bus and Taxi Lanes on Pottery Road, Wigan Lane and Wigan Road? For me and others I have spoken to we find it ridiculiously unneccesary to have ordinary traffic barred from these lanes for such an inordinate length of time. Should one travel to other greater connurbartions such Liverpool Manchester Dublin or Belfast you will see they permit ordinary traffic tom use lanes outside of peak travel 10am to 4pm and again after 7pm. Help free up the ordinary motorist in the Borough in an already congested road network.

Answer from Councillor K Anderson - Cabinet Portfolio for Environment and Communities:

Dear Mr Rotherham,

Thank you for your recent enquiry.  I can confirm that the guidance from Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) for all the Greater Manchester local authorities is that any bus lanes introduced should operate during one of the following periods to ensure consistence across all 10 authorities;

At all times;

Monday to Saturday 7am to 7pm; or

Monday to Friday 7:30am to 10am and 4pm to 6:30pm.

The bus lane on Pottery Road is to be removed as part of the Saddle Relief Scheme, which will be implemented before the end of 2012. The bus lane on Wigan Road/Wigan Lane operates Monday to Saturday 7am to 7pm. This bus lane runs in a southerly direction and has not reduced capacity on the highway network because there was only one lane in a southerly direction prior to the introduction of the bus lane.

Question reference number: 56564

Question submitted on 9 January 2012 by Mr D Marsh

In response to Cllr Ready's answer to question reference number 55433, Dear Cllr Ready, If the LSV facility was closed because part of the roof came off in the wind why was Howe Bridge Sports Centre closed also? Did the roof blow off the LSV and fly down the bypass and cause damage at Howe Bridge? Closing Howe Bridge shows clearly that you took the decision to prioritise facilities in Wigan over those in Leigh (the staff in LSV will verify this also).

Why are you avoiding this fact and not reimbursing the contract paying members of the facilities at LSV and Howe Bridge for the time we couldn't get into our facilities? Your reply says to me that you / WLCT think you can simply take the people who are supporting Council owned initiatives in Leigh for granted. Any other gym / facility that had clients paying contract would reimburse people for whatever reason they were meant to be open and were not and so should you. We paid for a service and you didn't provide it. Unsurprisingly the roof has since blown off again. What kind of facility have you constructed with public money at LSV? Who was responsible for the specification of the roof construction? Was it constructed below specification or was it simply designed below specification?

 The winds have been strong lately at times but I dread to think what could happen if the wind actually really got up to gale force speeds. It appears on the face of it that you have poured money into a heavily loss making venture and a not fit for purpose building and expect not to be accountable for problems stemming directly from this to those people who are its everyday paying clients. Is anybody going to pursue the contractor or whoever designed the specification for the roof? All of this of course comes on the back of another kick in the teeth from the diabolically limited opening hours over the Christmas and New Year period. LSV had one of the poorest opening records over this period out of any gym in Leigh without doubt.

The Council is in part responsible for enhancing the wellbeing of people in Leigh. Instead you seem to even think that you can pick and choose when you open as well. Why don't you ask WLCT to survey the LSV contract paying members about when they would like to see it open and do what the customers want, not what you / they want. In short as cabinet portfolio holder for communications and customer I find your response astonishing and I am worried about the stewardship that my area is currently in. I am struggling anywhere within your response to see how you are trying to safeguard and represent the interests of your electorate, the people who voted you in and who you should be accountable to.

I look forward to receiving answers to all of the above questions / queries separately but in particular could you directly answer the following also: Why do you think that you should not reimburse private paying contract members for the lost days due firstly on several instances to the poor construction of the building and secondly on a separate day due to strike action from certain staff in the Borough that in turn because of a calculated choice taken to decant staff from Leigh to Wigan closed our local WLCT run facilitates (whilst one in Wigan stayed open) and prevented people who need the facility to stay in good health or for rehabilitation from using those facilities that they have paid good money for in extremely difficult economic times (be it LSV or Howe Bridge).

Answer from Councillor Chris Ready- Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Communication and Customer:

Your question asks a number of specific points about the sports centre at LSV and also more general points about our leisure services provision.

The key information about LSV is:

On the 30th November a “profile ridge cap” on the roof of Leigh Indoor Sports Centre (LSV) was damaged by the wind and became loose. The ridge cap did not become completely separated from the roof at any time, but the damage meant that the centre had to be shut. Had some material hit a motor vehicle or a pedestrian, it would have caused severe damage. Accordingly, Leigh Indoor Sports Centre was closed for health and safety reasons and the area around the centre was cordoned off.

The day of the damage co-incided with a day of industrial action, when a number of leisure centres and swimming pools were affected as a significant number of WLCT staff supported the industrial action. Wigan Leisure and Culture Trust intended to open Leigh Indoor Sports Centre and the Wigan Life centre by moving those staff who wished to work to these two main sites, thus providing a level of provision across the Borough. Hindley Leisure Centre and Robin Park Indoor Arena also opened on this day. Our other leisure centres were shut.

Howe Bridge was not intended to open on the 30th November 2011, as provision was due to be available at LSV. When the unpredicted circumstances occurred that meant LSV had to be closed it was not operationally possible to open Howe Bridge as an alternative at short notice.

In January 2012, there were further instances of high winds and again, materials fell from the roof of Leigh Indoor Sports Centre to the ground. On this occasion, the high winds were more severe and lasted for two days, making it unsafe to affect any repairs to the roof. The centre was closed on 3rd and 4th January for health and safety reasons and re-opened at lunchtime on 5th January when the high winds had lapsed and the repairs to the roof had been completed.

An independent roofing specialist surveyed the roof on Monday 9th January 2012 and will be submitting a report.

Leigh Indoor Sports Centre was a design and build project where the council was the client. The Developer was Greenbank Partnerships. The construction company went into liquidation in 2010; therefore, the council will need to finance the repairs.

With regard to more general matter relating to leisure centres:

The council takes its role in enhancing the health of our residents across the whole borough very seriously. We offer very good opening hours across our leisure centres and, as part of the ongoing work considering our swimming pool provision, will be reviewing them in the next 6 months to ensure that we offer cost effective services at times when residents want to use them. The 2 occasions you have referred to when LSV was shut relate to very unusual circumstances in the form of severe weather, which on one day also co-incided with industrial action.

Aside from the public bank holidays, the majority of the leisure centres and pools were open for public use during the day time throughout the Christmas period. In previous years, WLCT have opened the centres during the evenings over the Christmas period but the level of usage was extremely low and as a result, the sites now open during the day time to meet the needs of customers. The opening hours at Leigh Indoor Sports Centre were comparable with the opening hours of the other centres which were open during this Christmas period.

When customers take out a Profiles fitness pass, they are joining the Profiles fitness suite facilities, of which there are five located across the borough. Aside from public Bank Holidays, WLCT have maintained a Profiles fitness suite service by providing access to a Profiles fitness suite throughout the year at one or more of the five sites where a Profiles fitness suite is located. On this basis, WLCT would not issue a refund because one of the five sites was closed for a day or two days for urgent and essential maintenance works throughout the year. If you feel aggrieved about this and wish to cancel your Profiles membership, please contact Martin Eden, Executive Director (WLCT) at m.eden@wlct.org and he will expedite the matter.

Question reference number: 56756

Question submitted on 16 January 2012 by Paul Jones

I have a local buisness and was wondering if there was any laws/by laws to giving leaflets out in the town centre. I am advertising my own fitness class "ZUMBA".

Answer from Councillor David Molyneux - Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Regeneration and Deputy Leader of the Council:

Dear Mr Jones, thank you for your question to Ask the Cabinet.

At the moment we do not have any by laws governing the distribution of fliers in our Town Centres, however we do advise businesses undertaking this type of activity to collect any fliers that have been discarded and help reduce the impact of litter in the town centre.

Should you require further information regarding promoting your business in the Town Centres please contact our Town Centre Manager Mr Mike Matthews tel. 01942 489194 or email m.matthews@wigan.gov.uk

Question reference number: 56960

Question submitted on 19 January 2012 by Phil Patterson 

With the new Wallgate and King Street junction layout now in place, why was the decision made to stop people accessing the train stations from one side of town? If the aim was to stop people using King Street and Wallgate as a short cut through town; could traffic not have been blocked at the WCML railway bridge across Wallgate? This would mean traffic could still turn left at the top of King Street to access the train stations, and still stop people understandably avoiding Caroline Street.

Answer from Councillor K Anderson - Cabinet Portfolio for Environment and Communities:

Dear Mr Patterson

I refer to your recent enquiry regarding the recently introduced prohibited left turn on King Street, Wigan at its junction with Wallgate.

Proposed amendments in this area have been under review for many years due to safety and environmental concerns. A safety scheme with movement restrictions was advertised in 2007 due to concerns with the amount of traffic ‘rat-running’ through the town centre, but was withdrawn for review due to objections.

A revised proposal was developed which prohibited vehicles turning left from King Street into Wallgate, except for buses, taxis and cycles. The intention of this is to prevent traffic using King Street as a rat run to access Wallgate and avoid the Caroline Street junction. Vehicles using this route as a rat run were causing significant congestion problems along Wallgate, particularly in the vicinity of the stations and the junction with King Street West.

The prohibited left turn is also required to assist with planned improvements at the junction of Queen Street, Caroline Street and Wallgate. Construction has recently begun on the Wigan South Central: Gateway – Phase 1 Saddle Relief Road scheme. This scheme involves major highway amendments running from Wigan town centre westwards to Saddle junction, including the provision of a new road from Pottery Road to Saddle junction. Improvements to Wallgate, Queen Street and Caroline Street form part of this scheme will provide an alternative route for traffic which is more suitable for the traffic volumes involved. However the proposals require a significant reduction in traffic travelling along Wallgate from the town centre area which is why the prohibition of left turn has been introduced at the King Street junction.

Traffic is still able access the railway stations with the new road, however vehicles should now use Caroline Street to access them. It would not have been practical to fully close the road at Wallgate bridge as this would have had a significant detrimental impact on public transport services and businesses in the area.

I appreciate that you may feel that the new road layout is not ideal however the amendments are essential to ensure that new road improvement schemes could go ahead and delays within the town centre are reduced. I trust that the above information is of assistance to you.

Yours sincerely

Question reference number: 57714

Question submitted by: Sarah Hilton on 30 January 2011

Do you pick up wardrobes that have been broken down?

Answer from Councillor K Anderson - Cabinet Portfolio for Environment and Communities:

Yes we will pick up wardrobes that are broken down and this is classed as one item, however we would request that any nails, staples or screws are removed from the item.